1 00:00:11,669 --> 00:00:09,190 on this episode of skeptico alex talks 2 00:00:14,709 --> 00:00:11,679 with philosopher and well-known atheist 3 00:00:15,829 --> 00:00:14,719 dr steven law author of believing 4 00:00:17,189 --> 00:00:15,839 [\h__\h] 5 00:00:19,349 --> 00:00:17,199 how not to get sucked into an 6 00:00:21,109 --> 00:00:19,359 intellectual black hole here's the 7 00:00:22,790 --> 00:00:21,119 example that i sent you and i have 8 00:00:25,109 --> 00:00:22,800 personal experience with because he told 9 00:00:27,670 --> 00:00:25,119 it to me and we discussed it on this 10 00:00:30,150 --> 00:00:27,680 show and that's british psychologist and 11 00:00:32,790 --> 00:00:30,160 parapsychology critic richard wiseman 12 00:00:35,750 --> 00:00:32,800 who has investigated probably more of 13 00:00:37,670 --> 00:00:35,760 these paranormal parapsychology claims 14 00:00:40,150 --> 00:00:37,680 like telepathy than just about anybody 15 00:00:42,869 --> 00:00:40,160 else and here's his quote i agree that 16 00:00:45,430 --> 00:00:42,879 by the standards of any other area of 17 00:00:48,069 --> 00:00:45,440 science that remote viewing and he later 18 00:00:50,470 --> 00:00:48,079 added in this quote esp 19 00:00:52,470 --> 00:00:50,480 is proven but that begs the question do 20 00:00:55,189 --> 00:00:52,480 we need higher standards of evidence 21 00:00:57,270 --> 00:00:55,199 when we study the paranormal so stephen 22 00:00:59,590 --> 00:00:57,280 this is not the fairy in the cup over 23 00:01:01,750 --> 00:00:59,600 here this is a guy who's reviewed 24 00:01:03,990 --> 00:01:01,760 hundreds of peer-reviewed papers and 25 00:01:06,149 --> 00:01:04,000 saying good enough for any other field 26 00:01:10,469 --> 00:01:06,159 but you know what not good enough 27 00:01:13,429 --> 00:01:10,479 because of the groundbreaking upset it 28 00:01:15,270 --> 00:01:13,439 would make for science i think this is 29 00:01:17,990 --> 00:01:15,280 the best evidence i could give you for 30 00:01:22,230 --> 00:01:18,000 my claim about scientific materialism 31 00:01:24,149 --> 00:01:22,240 being woven into science as we know it 32 00:01:26,070 --> 00:01:24,159 i think what 33 00:01:27,670 --> 00:01:26,080 presumably you wouldn't accept you know 34 00:01:29,350 --> 00:01:27,680 if i stick my finger out there and there 35 00:01:31,190 --> 00:01:29,360 appears to be a finger sort of fairy 36 00:01:33,109 --> 00:01:31,200 spinning around on the end of it you're 37 00:01:34,550 --> 00:01:33,119 going to be very very suspicious you're 38 00:01:36,310 --> 00:01:34,560 not just going to say 39 00:01:38,149 --> 00:01:36,320 yeah stephen's proved to me that there 40 00:01:41,030 --> 00:01:38,159 are fairies ah 41 00:01:43,350 --> 00:01:41,040 you're going to require a much more 42 00:01:44,950 --> 00:01:43,360 investigation before you take my word 43 00:01:46,789 --> 00:01:44,960 for it that there really is a fairies uh 44 00:01:49,109 --> 00:01:46,799 spinning around on the end of my finger 45 00:01:50,149 --> 00:01:49,119 and why is that it's because 46 00:01:52,230 --> 00:01:50,159 you know 47 00:01:54,710 --> 00:01:52,240 the the prior probability that anything 48 00:01:57,109 --> 00:01:54,720 like a theory exists is very very low 49 00:01:58,469 --> 00:01:57,119 indeed knowing what we do you know given 50 00:01:59,749 --> 00:01:58,479 our background knowledge 51 00:02:10,790 --> 00:01:59,759 stay with us 52 00:02:14,150 --> 00:02:12,550 welcome to skeptica where we explore 53 00:02:16,869 --> 00:02:14,160 controversial science with leading 54 00:02:18,790 --> 00:02:16,879 researchers thinkers and their critics 55 00:02:21,990 --> 00:02:18,800 i'm your host alex zaccharis and on this 56 00:02:25,910 --> 00:02:22,000 episode dr steven law oxford trained 57 00:02:29,270 --> 00:02:25,920 philosopher noted atheist and center for 58 00:02:31,990 --> 00:02:29,280 inquiry uk member now the reason i bring 59 00:02:34,390 --> 00:02:32,000 up the center for inquiry which is a 60 00:02:36,630 --> 00:02:34,400 very skeptical atheist kind of 61 00:02:37,630 --> 00:02:36,640 organization that seeks to 62 00:02:39,990 --> 00:02:37,640 debunk 63 00:02:42,790 --> 00:02:40,000 parapsychology often that seems to be 64 00:02:44,630 --> 00:02:42,800 where it gets a lot of its notoriety is 65 00:02:47,030 --> 00:02:44,640 that that's kind of the reason that i 66 00:02:49,430 --> 00:02:47,040 wanted to talk to dr law one of the 67 00:02:50,790 --> 00:02:49,440 questions that's been going on in my 68 00:02:52,350 --> 00:02:50,800 mind is 69 00:02:56,229 --> 00:02:52,360 what are the 70 00:02:59,589 --> 00:02:56,239 philosophical underpinnings to this 71 00:03:01,990 --> 00:02:59,599 atheism skepticism that we approach from 72 00:03:03,589 --> 00:03:02,000 so many angles and in particular i'm 73 00:03:05,910 --> 00:03:03,599 interested in 74 00:03:09,190 --> 00:03:05,920 what happens when we remove 75 00:03:11,110 --> 00:03:09,200 the religious argument the the heated 76 00:03:13,509 --> 00:03:11,120 debate that seems to dominate the 77 00:03:16,470 --> 00:03:13,519 conversation of of science versus 78 00:03:18,550 --> 00:03:16,480 religion as if that's really a debate to 79 00:03:20,790 --> 00:03:18,560 me as you know in this show i think 80 00:03:23,190 --> 00:03:20,800 we've moved way past that and have 81 00:03:25,430 --> 00:03:23,200 looked for the scientific evidence that 82 00:03:28,070 --> 00:03:25,440 is highly suggestive that consciousness 83 00:03:29,110 --> 00:03:28,080 survives death so the question in my 84 00:03:31,430 --> 00:03:29,120 mind is 85 00:03:33,190 --> 00:03:31,440 what do we do with consciousness 86 00:03:34,149 --> 00:03:33,200 survives death 87 00:03:36,630 --> 00:03:34,159 meets 88 00:03:38,869 --> 00:03:36,640 atheistic philosophy 89 00:03:41,830 --> 00:03:38,879 and that's what i sought to do in this 90 00:03:43,030 --> 00:03:41,840 interview with dr steven law i hope you 91 00:03:45,430 --> 00:03:43,040 enjoy it 92 00:03:48,229 --> 00:03:45,440 today we welcome dr steven law to 93 00:03:50,630 --> 00:03:48,239 skeptico dr law is a senior lecturer in 94 00:03:52,630 --> 00:03:50,640 philosophy at the university of london 95 00:03:54,789 --> 00:03:52,640 and editor of think 96 00:03:57,190 --> 00:03:54,799 the philosophy journal for the journal 97 00:03:58,949 --> 00:03:57,200 of the royal institute of philosophy 98 00:04:01,350 --> 00:03:58,959 he's here to talk about among other 99 00:04:04,630 --> 00:04:01,360 things his latest book believing 100 00:04:07,429 --> 00:04:04,640 [\h__\h] how not to get sucked into an 101 00:04:09,270 --> 00:04:07,439 intellectual black hole dr law is a 102 00:04:11,270 --> 00:04:09,280 great pleasure to have you on thanks so 103 00:04:13,509 --> 00:04:11,280 much for joining me 104 00:04:15,270 --> 00:04:13,519 hi it's moy my pleasure to be here but 105 00:04:16,390 --> 00:04:15,280 maybe i should say i'm at heathrow 106 00:04:18,629 --> 00:04:16,400 college 107 00:04:20,550 --> 00:04:18,639 uh the university of london well you 108 00:04:23,110 --> 00:04:20,560 know i i was going to say that but that 109 00:04:24,790 --> 00:04:23,120 has a lot less meaning to us over here 110 00:04:26,790 --> 00:04:24,800 in the states we always just kind of 111 00:04:28,790 --> 00:04:26,800 associate it the university of london 112 00:04:31,270 --> 00:04:28,800 goes wow that's pretty great if i said 113 00:04:32,950 --> 00:04:31,280 uh the college then he thought 114 00:04:35,110 --> 00:04:32,960 yeah he thought college is pretty great 115 00:04:36,870 --> 00:04:35,120 it deserves to be more widely known see 116 00:04:38,550 --> 00:04:36,880 there let's give it a plug there because 117 00:04:39,830 --> 00:04:38,560 it'll probably be more significant to 118 00:04:43,110 --> 00:04:39,840 folks over there 119 00:04:44,550 --> 00:04:43,120 so uh you are known uh probably to a lot 120 00:04:47,510 --> 00:04:44,560 of people through your 121 00:04:49,510 --> 00:04:47,520 forceful yet well-mannered arguments 122 00:04:51,670 --> 00:04:49,520 against some of the religious silliness 123 00:04:53,749 --> 00:04:51,680 that seems to pervade that seems to 124 00:04:56,790 --> 00:04:53,759 pervade our culture and i guess you 125 00:04:59,510 --> 00:04:56,800 could say to many are the kinder gentler 126 00:05:01,909 --> 00:04:59,520 atheist is that something that you kind 127 00:05:05,270 --> 00:05:01,919 of set out to do or just kind of 128 00:05:07,350 --> 00:05:05,280 naturally came from your personality 129 00:05:10,790 --> 00:05:07,360 well the atheism will be the kind of 130 00:05:13,270 --> 00:05:10,800 gently kinder gentler i guess yeah yeah 131 00:05:14,550 --> 00:05:13,280 i think yeah i guess 132 00:05:16,629 --> 00:05:14,560 uh 133 00:05:19,110 --> 00:05:16,639 i drifted i've always i've been an 134 00:05:21,990 --> 00:05:19,120 atheism an atheist for a long 135 00:05:24,070 --> 00:05:22,000 time i haven't always been an atheist 136 00:05:26,390 --> 00:05:24,080 but after i became interested in 137 00:05:27,909 --> 00:05:26,400 philosophy and started studying it 138 00:05:30,469 --> 00:05:27,919 academically 139 00:05:31,510 --> 00:05:30,479 it wasn't long before i became 140 00:05:34,070 --> 00:05:31,520 um 141 00:05:36,710 --> 00:05:34,080 an atheist but i wasn't i wasn't really 142 00:05:38,390 --> 00:05:36,720 an evangelical atheist i i wasn't 143 00:05:41,830 --> 00:05:38,400 concerned with going out there and 144 00:05:42,950 --> 00:05:41,840 spreading the word as it were 145 00:05:44,629 --> 00:05:42,960 um 146 00:05:46,550 --> 00:05:44,639 i've become 147 00:05:48,230 --> 00:05:46,560 better known for that more recently just 148 00:05:49,990 --> 00:05:48,240 because 149 00:05:52,310 --> 00:05:50,000 i've had more interaction with religious 150 00:05:55,110 --> 00:05:52,320 people and i enjoy interacting with 151 00:05:58,070 --> 00:05:55,120 religious people my my college um his 152 00:06:00,469 --> 00:05:58,080 religious foundation interestingly so 153 00:06:03,189 --> 00:06:00,479 i'm very much plugged into 154 00:06:05,430 --> 00:06:03,199 that world and so inevitably 155 00:06:07,430 --> 00:06:05,440 my research has become more focused on 156 00:06:09,430 --> 00:06:07,440 religion it wasn't at all focused on 157 00:06:11,270 --> 00:06:09,440 religion just a few years ago but i've 158 00:06:12,390 --> 00:06:11,280 become more and more interested in 159 00:06:15,029 --> 00:06:12,400 religion 160 00:06:17,830 --> 00:06:15,039 and so far as the kind of gentler 161 00:06:19,830 --> 00:06:17,840 face is concerned um 162 00:06:21,830 --> 00:06:19,840 well i'd like to think i'd like to think 163 00:06:23,830 --> 00:06:21,840 that was true um 164 00:06:25,270 --> 00:06:23,840 it's not i probably have to work at it a 165 00:06:28,230 --> 00:06:25,280 little bit i mean every now and then i 166 00:06:30,870 --> 00:06:28,240 can feel my blood beginning to boil 167 00:06:33,110 --> 00:06:30,880 and i just have to take a deep breath 168 00:06:34,950 --> 00:06:33,120 uh and just think for a moment but uh 169 00:06:36,309 --> 00:06:34,960 yeah so most of the time i manage i 170 00:06:39,590 --> 00:06:36,319 managed to 171 00:06:40,950 --> 00:06:39,600 create this facade at least that i'm 172 00:06:41,670 --> 00:06:40,960 right right right 173 00:06:43,189 --> 00:06:41,680 well 174 00:06:44,870 --> 00:06:43,199 of course i think it's more than a 175 00:06:47,350 --> 00:06:44,880 facade of course but 176 00:06:49,189 --> 00:06:47,360 your arguments invariably come back to 177 00:06:50,469 --> 00:06:49,199 philosophy that's who you are you're a 178 00:06:53,670 --> 00:06:50,479 philosopher 179 00:06:56,870 --> 00:06:53,680 and i'm just wondering you know in a in 180 00:07:00,550 --> 00:06:56,880 a society where none other than stephen 181 00:07:03,029 --> 00:07:00,560 hawking has pronounced philosophy dead 182 00:07:05,909 --> 00:07:03,039 maybe you ought to just speak to 183 00:07:07,909 --> 00:07:05,919 the need we have for philosophy and 184 00:07:09,189 --> 00:07:07,919 announce maybe that philosophy isn't 185 00:07:14,550 --> 00:07:09,199 dead 186 00:07:17,350 --> 00:07:14,560 yeah it just smells funny it's um 187 00:07:18,309 --> 00:07:17,360 it's zach said about jazz 188 00:07:20,150 --> 00:07:18,319 um 189 00:07:22,629 --> 00:07:20,160 i i think that 190 00:07:24,150 --> 00:07:22,639 philosophy is important um 191 00:07:25,510 --> 00:07:24,160 it seems to me that 192 00:07:27,110 --> 00:07:25,520 well if you ask a philosopher what is 193 00:07:29,029 --> 00:07:27,120 philosophy 194 00:07:31,990 --> 00:07:29,039 you're gonna get a lot of different 195 00:07:33,350 --> 00:07:32,000 answers of course um there's no real 196 00:07:35,110 --> 00:07:33,360 consensus 197 00:07:39,189 --> 00:07:35,120 even about what it is that we're doing 198 00:07:41,029 --> 00:07:39,199 amongst philosophers but my view is that 199 00:07:43,430 --> 00:07:41,039 well here's a fairly simple 200 00:07:46,550 --> 00:07:43,440 characterization i think a philosophy is 201 00:07:47,830 --> 00:07:46,560 grappling with those big questions and 202 00:07:50,150 --> 00:07:47,840 puzzles 203 00:07:51,990 --> 00:07:50,160 that appear at least appear to reach 204 00:07:54,869 --> 00:07:52,000 beyond the point where 205 00:07:57,029 --> 00:07:54,879 the empirical sciences or mathematics 206 00:07:59,990 --> 00:07:57,039 say would be 207 00:08:01,749 --> 00:08:00,000 able to provide us even in principle um 208 00:08:04,390 --> 00:08:01,759 with some kind of answer 209 00:08:07,749 --> 00:08:04,400 um so examples of questions or puzzles 210 00:08:13,430 --> 00:08:11,189 time travel okay now time travel 211 00:08:15,029 --> 00:08:13,440 are 212 00:08:17,270 --> 00:08:15,039 you can you can raise the question of 213 00:08:19,430 --> 00:08:17,280 whether it even makes sense whether 214 00:08:22,309 --> 00:08:19,440 there's some kind of logical 215 00:08:24,790 --> 00:08:22,319 contradiction involved in the very idea 216 00:08:25,589 --> 00:08:24,800 the very positive the very idea of time 217 00:08:27,909 --> 00:08:25,599 travel 218 00:08:29,909 --> 00:08:27,919 it's ruled out logically or conceptually 219 00:08:31,990 --> 00:08:29,919 perhaps now if you can do that if you 220 00:08:33,990 --> 00:08:32,000 can just by thinking through and 221 00:08:36,230 --> 00:08:34,000 unpacking the relevant concepts 222 00:08:37,430 --> 00:08:36,240 establish that it really doesn't make 223 00:08:39,990 --> 00:08:37,440 sense 224 00:08:41,670 --> 00:08:40,000 then we've answered a a fairly big and 225 00:08:43,509 --> 00:08:41,680 important question a question that 226 00:08:45,430 --> 00:08:43,519 scientists are interested in too but now 227 00:08:47,990 --> 00:08:45,440 we've done it from the comfort 228 00:08:50,470 --> 00:08:48,000 of our armchairs just by engaging in a 229 00:08:52,710 --> 00:08:50,480 bit of a priori 230 00:08:54,630 --> 00:08:52,720 conceptual reflection so that's some 231 00:08:56,550 --> 00:08:54,640 real progress that you could make by 232 00:08:57,670 --> 00:08:56,560 doing you know thought experiments 233 00:09:00,389 --> 00:08:57,680 rather than 234 00:09:02,870 --> 00:09:00,399 laboratory experiments um and then other 235 00:09:04,710 --> 00:09:02,880 examples would be 236 00:09:07,670 --> 00:09:04,720 why is there anything 237 00:09:10,870 --> 00:09:07,680 at all uh on the face of it that that's 238 00:09:13,110 --> 00:09:10,880 a question that science will necessarily 239 00:09:14,790 --> 00:09:13,120 be unable to answer because 240 00:09:17,350 --> 00:09:14,800 when scientists explain things they 241 00:09:18,470 --> 00:09:17,360 explain things by appealing to laws or 242 00:09:21,110 --> 00:09:18,480 causes 243 00:09:23,190 --> 00:09:21,120 which they have discovered um 244 00:09:26,710 --> 00:09:23,200 but then how could science explain the 245 00:09:29,030 --> 00:09:26,720 most fundamental laws uh it couldn't um 246 00:09:31,110 --> 00:09:29,040 those will necessarily be 247 00:09:33,110 --> 00:09:31,120 lie beyond the ability of science to to 248 00:09:34,949 --> 00:09:33,120 explain if if that's what a scientific 249 00:09:37,110 --> 00:09:34,959 explanation is so 250 00:09:39,110 --> 00:09:37,120 then we're we're in the territory of 251 00:09:39,990 --> 00:09:39,120 philosophy not just philosophy of course 252 00:09:42,389 --> 00:09:40,000 uh 253 00:09:44,310 --> 00:09:42,399 religion too tends to get involved with 254 00:09:45,990 --> 00:09:44,320 these big questions you know the other 255 00:09:48,310 --> 00:09:46,000 thing i think where philosophy really 256 00:09:50,310 --> 00:09:48,320 plays a role is in this whole business 257 00:09:51,910 --> 00:09:50,320 of paradigm shifting invariably we're 258 00:09:54,630 --> 00:09:51,920 always talking about shifting from one 259 00:09:56,949 --> 00:09:54,640 paradigm to another and i i think you 260 00:09:59,110 --> 00:09:56,959 know it's so funny that stephen hawking 261 00:10:00,870 --> 00:09:59,120 would say such a thing because 262 00:10:03,190 --> 00:10:00,880 physics has of course 263 00:10:05,350 --> 00:10:03,200 been in the middle of a paradigm shift 264 00:10:08,070 --> 00:10:05,360 for the last hundred years and i think 265 00:10:10,150 --> 00:10:08,080 who better than a philosopher using the 266 00:10:11,910 --> 00:10:10,160 tools of logic and reason to stand up 267 00:10:14,310 --> 00:10:11,920 and say hey wait a minute are we stuck 268 00:10:16,069 --> 00:10:14,320 in a rut here are we are we making some 269 00:10:18,470 --> 00:10:16,079 assumptions that we shouldn't be making 270 00:10:21,910 --> 00:10:18,480 i think it's a great tool and it it kind 271 00:10:24,550 --> 00:10:21,920 of strikes me as a valuable addition to 272 00:10:25,990 --> 00:10:24,560 this kind of thought process so paradigm 273 00:10:28,069 --> 00:10:26,000 shifting right 274 00:10:30,230 --> 00:10:28,079 yeah i think that's right um 275 00:10:33,829 --> 00:10:30,240 was it einstein who 276 00:10:34,710 --> 00:10:33,839 partially credited his reading of hume 277 00:10:36,710 --> 00:10:34,720 um 278 00:10:39,350 --> 00:10:36,720 with his his later subsequent 279 00:10:41,110 --> 00:10:39,360 discoveries it was this that kind of 280 00:10:43,110 --> 00:10:41,120 got him fired up got him motivated got 281 00:10:45,670 --> 00:10:43,120 him asking the kind of questions that 282 00:10:47,430 --> 00:10:45,680 then led him on to making 283 00:10:49,670 --> 00:10:47,440 these these new and important 284 00:10:51,269 --> 00:10:49,680 developments philosophy is very good at 285 00:10:53,269 --> 00:10:51,279 that getting people to take a step back 286 00:10:54,710 --> 00:10:53,279 and quit getting people to question the 287 00:10:57,190 --> 00:10:54,720 things that they have 288 00:10:59,030 --> 00:10:57,200 hitherto taken for granted even even 289 00:11:02,470 --> 00:10:59,040 within a scientific setting and that is 290 00:11:04,389 --> 00:11:02,480 often very fruitful indeed 291 00:11:07,030 --> 00:11:04,399 dr law i understand that you've taken a 292 00:11:09,670 --> 00:11:07,040 rather interesting and unconventional 293 00:11:12,630 --> 00:11:09,680 path to becoming an oxford trained 294 00:11:14,550 --> 00:11:12,640 professor of philosophy from a postman 295 00:11:16,150 --> 00:11:14,560 to a leading intellectual do i have that 296 00:11:18,069 --> 00:11:16,160 right uh tell us a little bit about your 297 00:11:20,710 --> 00:11:18,079 background yeah you have the placement 298 00:11:22,790 --> 00:11:20,720 there right certainly uh 299 00:11:25,350 --> 00:11:22,800 yeah i used to be a postman i was uh i 300 00:11:27,430 --> 00:11:25,360 was the placement for the forgerton uh 301 00:11:28,389 --> 00:11:27,440 part of cambridge for around about four 302 00:11:29,990 --> 00:11:28,399 years 303 00:11:31,910 --> 00:11:30,000 every other week i would deliver the 304 00:11:32,949 --> 00:11:31,920 mail very badly 305 00:11:35,430 --> 00:11:32,959 to 306 00:11:37,350 --> 00:11:35,440 houses i had very long hair back then it 307 00:11:40,870 --> 00:11:37,360 was right down my back 308 00:11:43,670 --> 00:11:40,880 uh so i was a hippie the hippie postman 309 00:11:46,310 --> 00:11:43,680 they'll probably remember me 310 00:11:48,470 --> 00:11:46,320 so yeah i started out there became 311 00:11:50,150 --> 00:11:48,480 interested in philosophy 312 00:11:51,590 --> 00:11:50,160 um i became interested in philosophical 313 00:11:53,269 --> 00:11:51,600 questions i wasn't really aware that 314 00:11:54,630 --> 00:11:53,279 there was this subject philosophy to 315 00:11:56,230 --> 00:11:54,640 begin with i just knew that i was 316 00:11:58,389 --> 00:11:56,240 interested in time travel and whether 317 00:11:59,990 --> 00:11:58,399 this might be a virtual world rather 318 00:12:01,670 --> 00:12:00,000 than a real one and whether or not god 319 00:12:03,990 --> 00:12:01,680 exists and what makes things right and 320 00:12:05,190 --> 00:12:04,000 wrong and so on those kind of questions 321 00:12:06,629 --> 00:12:05,200 and then i realized that yesterday you 322 00:12:07,590 --> 00:12:06,639 could pursue this 323 00:12:10,230 --> 00:12:07,600 stuff 324 00:12:12,069 --> 00:12:10,240 um at university and once i realized 325 00:12:14,470 --> 00:12:12,079 that then there was no stopping me i 326 00:12:17,350 --> 00:12:14,480 applied as a mature student 327 00:12:19,750 --> 00:12:17,360 and somehow by some miracle i gained 328 00:12:21,590 --> 00:12:19,760 intro to a university and i've never 329 00:12:24,629 --> 00:12:21,600 never left i think that's very humble i 330 00:12:27,590 --> 00:12:24,639 don't know many postmen who could decide 331 00:12:29,750 --> 00:12:27,600 that they're going to get a phd from 332 00:12:31,509 --> 00:12:29,760 oxford and then just go about doing it 333 00:12:33,430 --> 00:12:31,519 but we'll leave that aside let's let's 334 00:12:35,990 --> 00:12:33,440 talk for a minute about your most recent 335 00:12:37,750 --> 00:12:36,000 book believing [\h__\h] 336 00:12:39,910 --> 00:12:37,760 provocative title 337 00:12:41,110 --> 00:12:39,920 who's it written for it's written i 338 00:12:43,990 --> 00:12:41,120 guess 339 00:12:47,750 --> 00:12:44,000 one group of people that i rate it for 340 00:12:49,910 --> 00:12:47,760 well i've got fairly young kids um 341 00:12:51,190 --> 00:12:49,920 i was kind of a late starter with having 342 00:12:54,470 --> 00:12:51,200 children so i've affect fairly young 343 00:12:57,030 --> 00:12:54,480 kids and it concerns me 344 00:12:58,870 --> 00:12:57,040 that there are all these belief systems 345 00:12:59,829 --> 00:12:58,880 out there in the world 346 00:13:03,910 --> 00:12:59,839 um 347 00:13:05,829 --> 00:13:03,920 many benign but some not quite so benign 348 00:13:08,949 --> 00:13:05,839 and certainly belief systems which are 349 00:13:11,269 --> 00:13:08,959 capable of acting like a black hole 350 00:13:13,190 --> 00:13:11,279 an intellectual black hole you you get 351 00:13:15,829 --> 00:13:13,200 too close and you start getting sucked 352 00:13:17,509 --> 00:13:15,839 in and before you know it you're trapped 353 00:13:20,069 --> 00:13:17,519 in there and you can't you becoming an 354 00:13:21,990 --> 00:13:20,079 intellectual prisoner and so sometimes 355 00:13:23,670 --> 00:13:22,000 sometimes they're quite benign but 356 00:13:26,550 --> 00:13:23,680 sometimes they're really quite 357 00:13:27,990 --> 00:13:26,560 exploitative financially exploitative 358 00:13:29,910 --> 00:13:28,000 for example 359 00:13:32,069 --> 00:13:29,920 they take people away from their friends 360 00:13:34,150 --> 00:13:32,079 and families they make people give up 361 00:13:35,030 --> 00:13:34,160 opportunities that they really should 362 00:13:35,829 --> 00:13:35,040 take 363 00:13:39,350 --> 00:13:35,839 um 364 00:13:41,430 --> 00:13:39,360 and i it concerns me that our cultural 365 00:13:43,829 --> 00:13:41,440 environment contains those kind of 366 00:13:46,949 --> 00:13:43,839 dangerous belief systems and i think we 367 00:13:49,030 --> 00:13:46,959 should all know the warning signs if you 368 00:13:50,629 --> 00:13:49,040 like of 369 00:13:52,470 --> 00:13:50,639 an intellectual black hole so the book 370 00:13:53,990 --> 00:13:52,480 was really written for 371 00:13:56,389 --> 00:13:54,000 for everyone but particularly for young 372 00:13:59,269 --> 00:13:56,399 people who might come into contact with 373 00:14:01,430 --> 00:13:59,279 the belief system like that um just to 374 00:14:04,230 --> 00:14:01,440 give them some awareness 375 00:14:05,910 --> 00:14:04,240 of what the warning signs would be uh 376 00:14:07,910 --> 00:14:05,920 what the danger signals are so the 377 00:14:09,750 --> 00:14:07,920 little red light comes on in their head 378 00:14:11,430 --> 00:14:09,760 the next time some wide-eyed true 379 00:14:12,949 --> 00:14:11,440 believer thrusts a leaflet into their 380 00:14:14,949 --> 00:14:12,959 hand as they walk down the high street 381 00:14:16,870 --> 00:14:14,959 and says have you heard the truth the 382 00:14:19,350 --> 00:14:16,880 good news or whatever it happens 383 00:14:21,430 --> 00:14:19,360 here's a quote from the book 384 00:14:23,990 --> 00:14:21,440 when i talk about a [\h__\h] belief 385 00:14:26,550 --> 00:14:24,000 system it's not the content i'm 386 00:14:29,110 --> 00:14:26,560 suggesting is [\h__\h] but rather the 387 00:14:31,430 --> 00:14:29,120 manner in which its core beliefs are 388 00:14:35,110 --> 00:14:31,440 defended and promoted 389 00:14:36,949 --> 00:14:35,120 tell us a little bit about that sure um 390 00:14:39,509 --> 00:14:36,959 so i talk about all sorts of belief 391 00:14:41,350 --> 00:14:39,519 systems in the book um and 392 00:14:44,870 --> 00:14:41,360 in some cases 393 00:14:47,110 --> 00:14:44,880 the core beliefs could be true um so i'm 394 00:14:49,910 --> 00:14:47,120 not attacking the claim that the beliefs 395 00:14:52,790 --> 00:14:49,920 are true in in many cases what i'm 396 00:14:54,069 --> 00:14:52,800 pointing out is the way in which 397 00:14:56,470 --> 00:14:54,079 people will 398 00:14:59,750 --> 00:14:56,480 defend their beliefs begin to build a 399 00:15:02,069 --> 00:14:59,760 wall around them that immunizes their 400 00:15:04,790 --> 00:15:02,079 belief system and protects it from any 401 00:15:07,189 --> 00:15:04,800 kind of intellectual threat 402 00:15:09,990 --> 00:15:07,199 and creates a kind of a veneer 403 00:15:11,269 --> 00:15:10,000 of reasonableness of sort of foe or fake 404 00:15:13,670 --> 00:15:11,279 reasonableness 405 00:15:16,949 --> 00:15:13,680 um it's it's the mechanisms that are 406 00:15:19,750 --> 00:15:16,959 used that are applied to generate that 407 00:15:21,750 --> 00:15:19,760 kind of structure around the beliefs 408 00:15:23,829 --> 00:15:21,760 that then turns it into 409 00:15:26,069 --> 00:15:23,839 a sort of mental prison 410 00:15:27,750 --> 00:15:26,079 for the true believer it's it's those 411 00:15:29,110 --> 00:15:27,760 mechanisms that i'm that i'm most 412 00:15:31,670 --> 00:15:29,120 interested 413 00:15:33,189 --> 00:15:31,680 in i i identify a number of those in the 414 00:15:35,670 --> 00:15:33,199 book of course when we talk about 415 00:15:38,150 --> 00:15:35,680 [\h__\h] belief systems the discussion 416 00:15:40,470 --> 00:15:38,160 often comes back to debates about 417 00:15:43,030 --> 00:15:40,480 christianity a topic you're very 418 00:15:45,030 --> 00:15:43,040 comfortable debating and have debated 419 00:15:47,189 --> 00:15:45,040 some of the leading christian apologists 420 00:15:49,910 --> 00:15:47,199 and folks can find that on youtube or in 421 00:15:51,350 --> 00:15:49,920 any number of places i guess 422 00:15:53,110 --> 00:15:51,360 i feel like 423 00:15:55,030 --> 00:15:53,120 when i hear some of those debates i want 424 00:15:57,189 --> 00:15:55,040 to go wow is that really 425 00:15:59,269 --> 00:15:57,199 where we're at are we still 426 00:16:01,110 --> 00:15:59,279 talking about the empty tomb and 427 00:16:03,829 --> 00:16:01,120 debating that 428 00:16:05,350 --> 00:16:03,839 and on one hand i guess maybe that is 429 00:16:06,790 --> 00:16:05,360 where we're at 430 00:16:09,189 --> 00:16:06,800 on the other hand 431 00:16:11,110 --> 00:16:09,199 i guess i want to move the discussion 432 00:16:13,829 --> 00:16:11,120 forward and say okay you know that 433 00:16:15,990 --> 00:16:13,839 culture war debate is really over 434 00:16:18,710 --> 00:16:16,000 you've won here you go 435 00:16:20,550 --> 00:16:18,720 but let's move on to a more interesting 436 00:16:23,030 --> 00:16:20,560 culture war battle 437 00:16:24,949 --> 00:16:23,040 and that one i think is somewhat even 438 00:16:26,550 --> 00:16:24,959 obscured by this other debate we're 439 00:16:28,230 --> 00:16:26,560 having about you know 440 00:16:30,550 --> 00:16:28,240 empty tomb and all that stuff and that 441 00:16:33,430 --> 00:16:30,560 has to do with scientific 442 00:16:34,790 --> 00:16:33,440 materialism and whether or not 443 00:16:37,110 --> 00:16:34,800 we are 444 00:16:39,590 --> 00:16:37,120 anything these big picture questions 445 00:16:41,189 --> 00:16:39,600 meaning of life kind of questions 446 00:16:44,710 --> 00:16:41,199 what do you think about that are we 447 00:16:46,470 --> 00:16:44,720 stuck in a rut a little bit with the 448 00:16:49,990 --> 00:16:46,480 christian versus 449 00:16:52,230 --> 00:16:50,000 atheist debate and what about this idea 450 00:16:54,790 --> 00:16:52,240 of moving the debate to 451 00:16:56,870 --> 00:16:54,800 this notion of scientific materialism 452 00:16:59,509 --> 00:16:56,880 any thoughts on that well maybe i should 453 00:17:01,430 --> 00:16:59,519 just point out that um 454 00:17:02,829 --> 00:17:01,440 i'm not wedded to 455 00:17:05,429 --> 00:17:02,839 our 456 00:17:08,150 --> 00:17:05,439 naturalism or materialism 457 00:17:10,789 --> 00:17:08,160 as a philosopher in fact 458 00:17:13,750 --> 00:17:10,799 not that many philosophers 459 00:17:15,510 --> 00:17:13,760 are professional philosophers 460 00:17:17,669 --> 00:17:15,520 tend to be 461 00:17:21,510 --> 00:17:17,679 fairly divided on the naturalism issue 462 00:17:23,350 --> 00:17:21,520 there was a filled papers survey done 463 00:17:24,710 --> 00:17:23,360 a few years ago 464 00:17:26,870 --> 00:17:24,720 of professional philosophers and 465 00:17:29,909 --> 00:17:26,880 graduate students around the world only 466 00:17:31,350 --> 00:17:29,919 only around about 50 percent sign up to 467 00:17:34,150 --> 00:17:31,360 naturalism 468 00:17:36,789 --> 00:17:34,160 um i find you only about less than 15 469 00:17:38,950 --> 00:17:36,799 sign up to any kind of theism at all 470 00:17:40,710 --> 00:17:38,960 so they don't they don't believe in god 471 00:17:42,470 --> 00:17:40,720 very many of them the vast majority of 472 00:17:44,789 --> 00:17:42,480 them but still 473 00:17:46,950 --> 00:17:44,799 neither do they sign up to naturalism 474 00:17:48,230 --> 00:17:46,960 necessarily 475 00:17:51,350 --> 00:17:48,240 you often 476 00:17:52,870 --> 00:17:51,360 find debates about religion set up as 477 00:17:55,110 --> 00:17:52,880 debates between on the one hand 478 00:17:58,070 --> 00:17:55,120 religious people on the other hand 479 00:17:59,990 --> 00:17:58,080 the the naturalists and the materialists 480 00:18:02,710 --> 00:18:00,000 and the truth is that there are there 481 00:18:04,150 --> 00:18:02,720 are other options you you know it's not 482 00:18:06,150 --> 00:18:04,160 either or you don't have to be one or 483 00:18:07,350 --> 00:18:06,160 the other of those two things well well 484 00:18:09,029 --> 00:18:07,360 but really 485 00:18:10,390 --> 00:18:09,039 you know i i understand where you're 486 00:18:12,230 --> 00:18:10,400 where you're coming from on that and and 487 00:18:13,669 --> 00:18:12,240 this now becomes one of the problems i 488 00:18:15,430 --> 00:18:13,679 think that a lot of folks including 489 00:18:16,789 --> 00:18:15,440 myself have with philosophy and you 490 00:18:18,630 --> 00:18:16,799 don't fall into this as much which i 491 00:18:21,029 --> 00:18:18,640 really appreciate is that i think we 492 00:18:21,830 --> 00:18:21,039 have to stay grounded a little bit in 493 00:18:29,029 --> 00:18:21,840 the 494 00:18:31,029 --> 00:18:29,039 find ourselves in so this question of 495 00:18:33,510 --> 00:18:31,039 christianity or this question of god or 496 00:18:36,870 --> 00:18:33,520 no god really the atheism question 497 00:18:38,470 --> 00:18:36,880 really i think has been set up as a 498 00:18:41,190 --> 00:18:38,480 question about 499 00:18:43,350 --> 00:18:41,200 meaning materialism richard dawkins we 500 00:18:45,909 --> 00:18:43,360 are biological robots 501 00:18:47,430 --> 00:18:45,919 life has no meaning your consciousness 502 00:18:50,549 --> 00:18:47,440 is an illusion 503 00:18:53,909 --> 00:18:50,559 that is really the core intellectual 504 00:18:55,510 --> 00:18:53,919 thrust of atheism so it might not be 505 00:18:58,230 --> 00:18:55,520 your atheism but i think you'd have to 506 00:19:01,190 --> 00:18:58,240 concede that you know that is the core 507 00:19:03,510 --> 00:19:01,200 thrust of the atheism debate if you will 508 00:19:05,350 --> 00:19:03,520 and i i would suggest to you go ahead 509 00:19:07,990 --> 00:19:05,360 i'm sorry yeah i'm not sure that's true 510 00:19:09,830 --> 00:19:08,000 i mean there clearly are some very vocal 511 00:19:12,470 --> 00:19:09,840 atheists who also you know very much 512 00:19:14,150 --> 00:19:12,480 wedded to materialism and naturalism 513 00:19:17,029 --> 00:19:14,160 but there are there are quite a few like 514 00:19:18,950 --> 00:19:17,039 me that that are not um 515 00:19:20,230 --> 00:19:18,960 so you know there are a range of views 516 00:19:22,230 --> 00:19:20,240 and 517 00:19:25,270 --> 00:19:22,240 it it one of the things that bothers me 518 00:19:27,590 --> 00:19:25,280 is the way in which our religious people 519 00:19:30,390 --> 00:19:27,600 think that they can establish atheism as 520 00:19:33,190 --> 00:19:30,400 false by simply finding fault with 521 00:19:35,830 --> 00:19:33,200 naturalism or materialism so if they 522 00:19:37,909 --> 00:19:35,840 could just show for example that there's 523 00:19:38,789 --> 00:19:37,919 the consciousness cannot be accommodated 524 00:19:41,350 --> 00:19:38,799 within 525 00:19:43,350 --> 00:19:41,360 um a sort of naturalistic worldview well 526 00:19:44,950 --> 00:19:43,360 then that's atheism sorted you can't be 527 00:19:47,750 --> 00:19:44,960 an atheist now that doesn't follow at 528 00:19:49,909 --> 00:19:47,760 all um that's just a poor argument 529 00:19:52,070 --> 00:19:49,919 against atheism i mean i'm an atheist i 530 00:19:54,150 --> 00:19:52,080 don't believe in god or gods but that 531 00:19:56,870 --> 00:19:54,160 doesn't mean that i had to sign up to 532 00:19:59,510 --> 00:19:56,880 naturalism or materialism not at all i 533 00:20:00,789 --> 00:19:59,520 could be a mathematical platonist for 534 00:20:02,549 --> 00:20:00,799 example 535 00:20:04,230 --> 00:20:02,559 as many mathematicians are aren't they 536 00:20:07,029 --> 00:20:04,240 they they believe that mathematics 537 00:20:08,470 --> 00:20:07,039 describes some non-natural realm well i 538 00:20:09,430 --> 00:20:08,480 could take that view without believing 539 00:20:11,350 --> 00:20:09,440 in god 540 00:20:13,510 --> 00:20:11,360 so i could be an atheist without being a 541 00:20:15,750 --> 00:20:13,520 naturalist or materialist i'm gonna try 542 00:20:17,830 --> 00:20:15,760 and dance around that because speaking 543 00:20:19,510 --> 00:20:17,840 of intellectual black holes that's an 544 00:20:21,270 --> 00:20:19,520 argument we could get into about god and 545 00:20:23,669 --> 00:20:21,280 then defining god and your definition 546 00:20:24,630 --> 00:20:23,679 and all that i i do want to come back to 547 00:20:26,549 --> 00:20:24,640 this though because we're on to 548 00:20:27,830 --> 00:20:26,559 something and that's that i want to talk 549 00:20:30,070 --> 00:20:27,840 about meaning 550 00:20:32,070 --> 00:20:30,080 meaning in life meaning in 551 00:20:35,029 --> 00:20:32,080 the universe because i think that's one 552 00:20:37,190 --> 00:20:35,039 of the hardest challenges that atheists 553 00:20:39,350 --> 00:20:37,200 face and whether it's explicit or 554 00:20:41,830 --> 00:20:39,360 implicit i think it's where people are 555 00:20:43,029 --> 00:20:41,840 coming from and that's that hey you're 556 00:20:45,110 --> 00:20:43,039 telling me 557 00:20:47,029 --> 00:20:45,120 mr atheist and i'm not hanging this on 558 00:20:49,430 --> 00:20:47,039 you but you're telling me life has no 559 00:20:51,270 --> 00:20:49,440 meaning and yet i know my life has 560 00:20:53,350 --> 00:20:51,280 meaning i know it kind of 561 00:20:55,909 --> 00:20:53,360 intuitively i know my life has meaning 562 00:20:57,510 --> 00:20:55,919 so convince to me that my life doesn't 563 00:20:58,950 --> 00:20:57,520 have meaning and i think we can back 564 00:21:01,270 --> 00:20:58,960 that up again i can go to richard 565 00:21:03,350 --> 00:21:01,280 dawkins and we are biological robots or 566 00:21:05,350 --> 00:21:03,360 i can go to daniel dennett and you are 567 00:21:07,029 --> 00:21:05,360 an illusion i mean this isn't this one 568 00:21:10,789 --> 00:21:07,039 of the core tenets 569 00:21:13,510 --> 00:21:10,799 if not of atheism of the cultural 570 00:21:15,830 --> 00:21:13,520 message that we get about atheism and 571 00:21:17,350 --> 00:21:15,840 that is that life has no meaning well 572 00:21:20,870 --> 00:21:17,360 that's an enormous question whether life 573 00:21:22,870 --> 00:21:20,880 has meaning or not um 574 00:21:25,750 --> 00:21:22,880 i you know i if you're interested in 575 00:21:27,590 --> 00:21:25,760 what i think i would read my book on 576 00:21:28,630 --> 00:21:27,600 humanism a very short introduction to 577 00:21:31,350 --> 00:21:28,640 humanism because it's got a whole 578 00:21:33,990 --> 00:21:31,360 chapter on the meaning of life um in it 579 00:21:35,750 --> 00:21:34,000 um i couldn't begin to unpack all of the 580 00:21:38,870 --> 00:21:35,760 issues here but it seems to me that 581 00:21:41,029 --> 00:21:38,880 first of all both theists and atheists 582 00:21:43,190 --> 00:21:41,039 have a problem so far as the meaning of 583 00:21:45,350 --> 00:21:43,200 life is concerned it's all very well 584 00:21:46,789 --> 00:21:45,360 saying hey you mr atheist you explain 585 00:21:48,549 --> 00:21:46,799 the meaning of life but the truth is 586 00:21:50,470 --> 00:21:48,559 that when you listen to 587 00:21:52,149 --> 00:21:50,480 the accounts of 588 00:21:54,990 --> 00:21:52,159 a meaningful life that are given by the 589 00:21:56,950 --> 00:21:55,000 religious they often turn out to be very 590 00:21:58,470 --> 00:21:56,960 unsatisfactory too 591 00:22:00,310 --> 00:21:58,480 being told for example that you were 592 00:22:02,630 --> 00:22:00,320 made for a purpose 593 00:22:04,710 --> 00:22:02,640 uh and that gives your life meaning 594 00:22:06,950 --> 00:22:04,720 um that that's the explanation for why 595 00:22:08,870 --> 00:22:06,960 it has meaning it's not a very good 596 00:22:10,950 --> 00:22:08,880 explanation i mean suppose it turns out 597 00:22:13,750 --> 00:22:10,960 that i was indeed made for a purpose 598 00:22:15,430 --> 00:22:13,760 suppose we all were uh engineered by 599 00:22:16,950 --> 00:22:15,440 aliens to clean their toilets and 600 00:22:18,230 --> 00:22:16,960 they're coming soon to pick us up and 601 00:22:20,630 --> 00:22:18,240 take us off and 602 00:22:22,789 --> 00:22:20,640 deliver us to their toilets where we'll 603 00:22:23,750 --> 00:22:22,799 be find ourselves happily slaving away 604 00:22:25,750 --> 00:22:23,760 forever 605 00:22:27,510 --> 00:22:25,760 doing the job that we were always meant 606 00:22:29,350 --> 00:22:27,520 to do does that do you now feel that 607 00:22:31,750 --> 00:22:29,360 your life has meaning 608 00:22:33,270 --> 00:22:31,760 not at all uh having a purpose being 609 00:22:35,270 --> 00:22:33,280 made for a purpose does not give your 610 00:22:36,549 --> 00:22:35,280 life meaning certainly certainly not 611 00:22:38,789 --> 00:22:36,559 necessarily 612 00:22:41,270 --> 00:22:38,799 and so these quick easy glib religious 613 00:22:43,750 --> 00:22:41,280 answers are not really good answers at 614 00:22:45,590 --> 00:22:43,760 all um they just create 615 00:22:47,510 --> 00:22:45,600 they just create the illusion that 616 00:22:49,510 --> 00:22:47,520 meaning has somehow miraculously been 617 00:22:50,789 --> 00:22:49,520 conjured up by the really by the 618 00:22:52,149 --> 00:22:50,799 religious person but on closer 619 00:22:53,669 --> 00:22:52,159 examination the meaning just runs 620 00:22:55,350 --> 00:22:53,679 through your fingers so meaning is a 621 00:22:57,270 --> 00:22:55,360 problem for everyone i don't think it's 622 00:22:59,909 --> 00:22:57,280 that atheists particularly have a 623 00:23:02,870 --> 00:22:59,919 problem any more than theists 624 00:23:05,669 --> 00:23:02,880 i agree for the most part i do think 625 00:23:08,630 --> 00:23:05,679 that then we have to be explicit and say 626 00:23:10,789 --> 00:23:08,640 biological robots richard dawkins is a 627 00:23:13,029 --> 00:23:10,799 silly notion consciousness is an 628 00:23:15,510 --> 00:23:13,039 illusion daniel dennett is a silly 629 00:23:17,029 --> 00:23:15,520 notion and put it kind of if we just 630 00:23:17,990 --> 00:23:17,039 want to kind of sort it out and say all 631 00:23:20,789 --> 00:23:18,000 these 632 00:23:22,789 --> 00:23:20,799 goofy religious dogma concepts are silly 633 00:23:24,310 --> 00:23:22,799 and we can kind of throw them away then 634 00:23:26,390 --> 00:23:24,320 you know let's throw these guys away too 635 00:23:28,710 --> 00:23:26,400 because i don't think any of that really 636 00:23:30,230 --> 00:23:28,720 makes much sense either i i always think 637 00:23:31,990 --> 00:23:30,240 and i sent you this quota so i'd love to 638 00:23:32,950 --> 00:23:32,000 get your comment on it i always think of 639 00:23:37,669 --> 00:23:32,960 the 640 00:23:41,350 --> 00:23:37,679 famous nobel prize-winning french 641 00:23:43,870 --> 00:23:41,360 philosopher albert camus who said 642 00:23:46,149 --> 00:23:43,880 there's really only one serious 643 00:23:49,510 --> 00:23:46,159 philosophical question and that is 644 00:23:51,350 --> 00:23:49,520 suicide and i think you know it's pretty 645 00:23:53,350 --> 00:23:51,360 very french very french but i think it 646 00:23:54,789 --> 00:23:53,360 gets the heart of this meaning i mean if 647 00:23:56,470 --> 00:23:54,799 you really think 648 00:23:58,390 --> 00:23:56,480 life has no meaning 649 00:24:00,950 --> 00:23:58,400 then 650 00:24:04,149 --> 00:24:00,960 what is there i mean what really 651 00:24:06,230 --> 00:24:04,159 could possibly be a motivation for life 652 00:24:08,070 --> 00:24:06,240 i think it's almost a given that our 653 00:24:10,630 --> 00:24:08,080 life has meaning because that's how we 654 00:24:13,750 --> 00:24:10,640 live our life that is that we our life 655 00:24:15,909 --> 00:24:13,760 is defined by the decisions we make how 656 00:24:18,230 --> 00:24:15,919 we live our life is what is what we 657 00:24:20,390 --> 00:24:18,240 believe and no one lives their life as 658 00:24:21,669 --> 00:24:20,400 it as if it has no meaning no but are 659 00:24:23,590 --> 00:24:21,679 you suggesting that the life of an 660 00:24:25,110 --> 00:24:23,600 atheist is uh 661 00:24:27,830 --> 00:24:25,120 is meaningless 662 00:24:30,549 --> 00:24:27,840 well i i'm suggesting that 663 00:24:31,590 --> 00:24:30,559 that that this is the philosophical 664 00:24:33,350 --> 00:24:31,600 route 665 00:24:36,230 --> 00:24:33,360 that has to be 666 00:24:39,029 --> 00:24:36,240 fully taken in and fully addressed so 667 00:24:41,669 --> 00:24:39,039 i i think it gets obscured because i 668 00:24:44,310 --> 00:24:41,679 understand i get it you know inundated 669 00:24:46,870 --> 00:24:44,320 with religious [\h__\h] 670 00:24:48,870 --> 00:24:46,880 inundated with a religious 671 00:24:51,029 --> 00:24:48,880 black hole that just kind of is 672 00:24:53,190 --> 00:24:51,039 confusing and doesn't make sense and is 673 00:24:55,430 --> 00:24:53,200 infused into our society in a way that 674 00:24:57,590 --> 00:24:55,440 just makes you question the institutions 675 00:24:59,110 --> 00:24:57,600 that we have around us i get all that 676 00:25:01,190 --> 00:24:59,120 but when you get to the other side of 677 00:25:04,310 --> 00:25:01,200 that and you say well then wait a minute 678 00:25:06,630 --> 00:25:04,320 am i buying into this other idea of my 679 00:25:08,070 --> 00:25:06,640 life has no meaning of course it's not 680 00:25:10,390 --> 00:25:08,080 because that doesn't make any sense 681 00:25:13,190 --> 00:25:10,400 either so we're kind of i i think it's 682 00:25:15,110 --> 00:25:13,200 facing the reality that we really are 683 00:25:17,350 --> 00:25:15,120 between these two worlds if we think 684 00:25:19,350 --> 00:25:17,360 things through but it's it's a classic 685 00:25:21,269 --> 00:25:19,360 philosophical conundrum isn't it you 686 00:25:23,350 --> 00:25:21,279 know what is the meaning of life what 687 00:25:26,390 --> 00:25:23,360 makes life meaningful and in fact there 688 00:25:28,630 --> 00:25:26,400 are plenty of um atheist answers to that 689 00:25:30,230 --> 00:25:28,640 question which perhaps they're not going 690 00:25:31,909 --> 00:25:30,240 to you you're not going to find them 691 00:25:34,070 --> 00:25:31,919 very attractive answers or very 692 00:25:36,149 --> 00:25:34,080 plausible answers but the fact is that 693 00:25:37,830 --> 00:25:36,159 religious answers tend not to be very 694 00:25:39,590 --> 00:25:37,840 plausible either when you start to look 695 00:25:41,110 --> 00:25:39,600 at them more closely it's just a 696 00:25:42,390 --> 00:25:41,120 philosophical 697 00:25:44,390 --> 00:25:42,400 puzzle 698 00:25:45,990 --> 00:25:44,400 in much the same way as 699 00:25:47,830 --> 00:25:46,000 i don't know why is there anything at 700 00:25:49,590 --> 00:25:47,840 all it's a philosophical puzzle there 701 00:25:51,350 --> 00:25:49,600 are all sorts of philosophical puzzles 702 00:25:53,510 --> 00:25:51,360 and we what i think we should do is we 703 00:25:55,029 --> 00:25:53,520 should acknowledge that they're tough 704 00:25:56,549 --> 00:25:55,039 and we don't necessarily know the 705 00:25:58,789 --> 00:25:56,559 answers 706 00:26:01,110 --> 00:25:58,799 to them but it doesn't follow them that 707 00:26:03,110 --> 00:26:01,120 the default position must be to kind of 708 00:26:05,909 --> 00:26:03,120 immediately appeal to god or the 709 00:26:08,070 --> 00:26:05,919 supernatural uh and suppose that that 710 00:26:09,990 --> 00:26:08,080 then must be the correct answer i can't 711 00:26:12,230 --> 00:26:10,000 say that that's that's right totally 712 00:26:13,029 --> 00:26:12,240 agree but but neither should we appeal 713 00:26:17,269 --> 00:26:13,039 to 714 00:26:23,029 --> 00:26:17,279 uh 715 00:26:25,590 --> 00:26:23,039 like i said you know a daniel dennett 716 00:26:27,350 --> 00:26:25,600 biological robot meme you know i mean 717 00:26:28,630 --> 00:26:27,360 that stuff when you really break it down 718 00:26:29,909 --> 00:26:28,640 doesn't make any sense but i've kind of 719 00:26:31,190 --> 00:26:29,919 already said that we've covered that 720 00:26:33,269 --> 00:26:31,200 ground i don't know if it doesn't make 721 00:26:34,870 --> 00:26:33,279 any sense i mean you know whether or not 722 00:26:36,470 --> 00:26:34,880 um 723 00:26:38,390 --> 00:26:36,480 you know precisely what the relationship 724 00:26:42,549 --> 00:26:38,400 is between mind and body 725 00:26:44,870 --> 00:26:42,559 uh is a is a very very interesting 726 00:26:46,470 --> 00:26:44,880 question i don't sign up to any 727 00:26:48,070 --> 00:26:46,480 particular view 728 00:26:50,710 --> 00:26:48,080 so far as that 729 00:26:54,149 --> 00:26:50,720 question is concerned but i have to say 730 00:26:55,669 --> 00:26:54,159 that there is a pretty good looking case 731 00:26:57,190 --> 00:26:55,679 for saying 732 00:26:59,029 --> 00:26:57,200 that 733 00:27:02,470 --> 00:26:59,039 if the mind is to have any kind of 734 00:27:05,990 --> 00:27:02,480 effect within the physical natural realm 735 00:27:07,909 --> 00:27:06,000 it somehow has to be part of that realm 736 00:27:09,350 --> 00:27:07,919 um 737 00:27:10,630 --> 00:27:09,360 you know i'm not necessarily endorsing 738 00:27:12,630 --> 00:27:10,640 this argument but there's nothing 739 00:27:15,110 --> 00:27:12,640 there's a pretty good looking argument 740 00:27:16,950 --> 00:27:15,120 for saying that if the mind is to have 741 00:27:18,950 --> 00:27:16,960 effects within the physical world it 742 00:27:20,470 --> 00:27:18,960 must be physical because what we know of 743 00:27:22,950 --> 00:27:20,480 the physical world 744 00:27:25,990 --> 00:27:22,960 everywhere we look we find that physical 745 00:27:27,590 --> 00:27:26,000 effects have physical causes and so if 746 00:27:29,909 --> 00:27:27,600 that is true 747 00:27:31,029 --> 00:27:29,919 then the mind must itself somehow be 748 00:27:33,110 --> 00:27:31,039 physical we're going to have to 749 00:27:35,750 --> 00:27:33,120 accommodate it within the physical in 750 00:27:38,070 --> 00:27:35,760 order to account for its ability to 751 00:27:40,230 --> 00:27:38,080 cause physical behavior for example 752 00:27:42,470 --> 00:27:40,240 whether isn't that a isn't that a fairly 753 00:27:45,430 --> 00:27:42,480 plausible looking argument perhaps but 754 00:27:47,269 --> 00:27:45,440 i'd say we better be damn sure that 755 00:27:51,110 --> 00:27:47,279 that's the way it is because we've built 756 00:27:53,909 --> 00:27:51,120 this edifice of scientism around that 757 00:27:55,750 --> 00:27:53,919 our whole culture is built on that and 758 00:27:58,149 --> 00:27:55,760 when we start seeing cracks in the 759 00:27:59,669 --> 00:27:58,159 foundation of that which i think we do 760 00:28:02,389 --> 00:27:59,679 and it sounds like you're at least 761 00:28:04,470 --> 00:28:02,399 somewhat open to examining those i think 762 00:28:07,750 --> 00:28:04,480 we really have to step back and look at 763 00:28:10,549 --> 00:28:07,760 what's at stake let me in that spirit 764 00:28:12,710 --> 00:28:10,559 return to your book believing [\h__\h] 765 00:28:14,710 --> 00:28:12,720 with another quote that i liked the more 766 00:28:16,789 --> 00:28:14,720 we appeal to mystery to get ourselves 767 00:28:19,190 --> 00:28:16,799 out of intellectual trouble the more we 768 00:28:21,590 --> 00:28:19,200 use it as a carpet under which to sweep 769 00:28:24,310 --> 00:28:21,600 inconvenient truths or discoveries the 770 00:28:27,750 --> 00:28:24,320 more vulnerable we become to deceit 771 00:28:28,830 --> 00:28:27,760 deceit by both others and by ourselves 772 00:28:31,750 --> 00:28:28,840 let me 773 00:28:34,710 --> 00:28:31,760 juxtapose the quote from your book with 774 00:28:37,350 --> 00:28:34,720 a quote from biologist rupert sheldrick 775 00:28:39,430 --> 00:28:37,360 author of the science delusion one of 776 00:28:41,830 --> 00:28:39,440 these folks out there among many many 777 00:28:44,630 --> 00:28:41,840 that i've spoken with and are out there 778 00:28:46,950 --> 00:28:44,640 who kind of see this materialism 779 00:28:49,269 --> 00:28:46,960 scientific materialism and the position 780 00:28:51,750 --> 00:28:49,279 of the folks like richard dawkins as a 781 00:28:53,590 --> 00:28:51,760 major impediment to really moving 782 00:28:56,470 --> 00:28:53,600 forward and answering some of these big 783 00:28:58,630 --> 00:28:56,480 questions here's what sheldrick says 784 00:29:00,230 --> 00:28:58,640 for more than 200 years materialists 785 00:29:02,549 --> 00:29:00,240 have promised that science will 786 00:29:05,990 --> 00:29:02,559 eventually explain everything in terms 787 00:29:08,149 --> 00:29:06,000 of physics and chemistry these believers 788 00:29:10,870 --> 00:29:08,159 are sustained by the faith that 789 00:29:12,710 --> 00:29:10,880 scientific discoveries will justify 790 00:29:14,389 --> 00:29:12,720 their beliefs so of course he's been a 791 00:29:17,669 --> 00:29:14,399 little bit provocative in kind of using 792 00:29:20,630 --> 00:29:17,679 these words of religion but i i think he 793 00:29:23,510 --> 00:29:20,640 has a point when he talks about this 794 00:29:26,230 --> 00:29:23,520 promissory note of science and that 795 00:29:28,789 --> 00:29:26,240 really being a part of scientism of just 796 00:29:30,950 --> 00:29:28,799 hey wait a minute boys we got it covered 797 00:29:32,630 --> 00:29:30,960 just give us some more time when really 798 00:29:35,909 --> 00:29:32,640 when we look at the long history of 799 00:29:38,630 --> 00:29:35,919 science for the last 200 years we see 800 00:29:40,070 --> 00:29:38,640 progress in some areas and in other 801 00:29:41,830 --> 00:29:40,080 areas the kind of questions we're 802 00:29:44,870 --> 00:29:41,840 talking about in terms of 803 00:29:48,070 --> 00:29:44,880 consciousness in terms of meaning we see 804 00:29:49,430 --> 00:29:48,080 very little progress or or worse yet we 805 00:29:51,269 --> 00:29:49,440 see progress 806 00:29:53,430 --> 00:29:51,279 that's leading us in another direction 807 00:29:55,669 --> 00:29:53,440 that we're not willing to follow because 808 00:29:58,149 --> 00:29:55,679 we're married to this idea that unless 809 00:30:00,630 --> 00:29:58,159 we can measure everything then we're 810 00:30:02,870 --> 00:30:00,640 going to be lost right well i i i don't 811 00:30:05,430 --> 00:30:02,880 sign up to scientism if scientism is the 812 00:30:07,350 --> 00:30:05,440 view that ultimately every meaningful 813 00:30:09,990 --> 00:30:07,360 question can be answered by an 814 00:30:11,750 --> 00:30:10,000 application of the empirical sciences 815 00:30:14,310 --> 00:30:11,760 then i don't sign up to that but then 816 00:30:17,269 --> 00:30:14,320 the vast majority of scientists don't 817 00:30:18,950 --> 00:30:17,279 sign up to that either actually they 818 00:30:21,430 --> 00:30:18,960 acknowledge that moral questions for 819 00:30:23,669 --> 00:30:21,440 example are questions that science is 820 00:30:25,669 --> 00:30:23,679 not well placed to answer 821 00:30:27,590 --> 00:30:25,679 and many other questions too and in fact 822 00:30:29,669 --> 00:30:27,600 even richard dawkins in the god delusion 823 00:30:32,630 --> 00:30:29,679 makes it clear that he doesn't think 824 00:30:35,590 --> 00:30:32,640 that science can answer every question 825 00:30:39,029 --> 00:30:35,600 so very very few people actually are 826 00:30:41,430 --> 00:30:39,039 wedded to scientism um also very many 827 00:30:42,789 --> 00:30:41,440 scientists are not wedded to materialism 828 00:30:44,230 --> 00:30:42,799 because as a matter of fact they're 829 00:30:47,190 --> 00:30:44,240 religious 830 00:30:49,190 --> 00:30:47,200 right many christians are scientists 831 00:30:51,350 --> 00:30:49,200 they're clearly not materialists but 832 00:30:53,110 --> 00:30:51,360 they really do believe that by using 833 00:30:54,870 --> 00:30:53,120 science they can really understand a 834 00:30:57,029 --> 00:30:54,880 great deal of the world around us and 835 00:30:59,029 --> 00:30:57,039 indeed that science is the best tool for 836 00:31:01,750 --> 00:30:59,039 finding out about that world that we see 837 00:31:03,430 --> 00:31:01,760 around us so i just don't buy this oh 838 00:31:06,789 --> 00:31:03,440 science is all about materialism and 839 00:31:08,389 --> 00:31:06,799 scientism that just seems to me to be an 840 00:31:09,430 --> 00:31:08,399 excuse 841 00:31:12,389 --> 00:31:09,440 for 842 00:31:14,470 --> 00:31:12,399 a way of explaining a way why it is that 843 00:31:16,470 --> 00:31:14,480 maybe science scientists aren't signing 844 00:31:19,430 --> 00:31:16,480 up to what it is that sheldrake wants 845 00:31:21,909 --> 00:31:19,440 them to sign up to maybe well i i don't 846 00:31:24,149 --> 00:31:21,919 know on that last part i think there's a 847 00:31:26,789 --> 00:31:24,159 deeper point here when we talk about 848 00:31:27,830 --> 00:31:26,799 scientific materialism and this idea 849 00:31:29,590 --> 00:31:27,840 that 850 00:31:32,630 --> 00:31:29,600 you know when it comes down to it 851 00:31:33,909 --> 00:31:32,640 science is nothing if we can't measure 852 00:31:36,070 --> 00:31:33,919 things right 853 00:31:38,789 --> 00:31:36,080 and the notion that 854 00:31:41,430 --> 00:31:38,799 we are something more than our brain 855 00:31:43,830 --> 00:31:41,440 that mind equals brain isn't true we are 856 00:31:45,830 --> 00:31:43,840 not biological robots and you said 857 00:31:48,230 --> 00:31:45,840 earlier that falsifying that doesn't 858 00:31:50,310 --> 00:31:48,240 mean an end to atheism and we could go 859 00:31:52,870 --> 00:31:50,320 off on that discussion i think to a 860 00:31:56,149 --> 00:31:52,880 certain extent falsifying that does 861 00:31:58,389 --> 00:31:56,159 bring an end to scientific materialism 862 00:32:01,590 --> 00:31:58,399 in a way that it's currently deeply 863 00:32:04,070 --> 00:32:01,600 deeply embedded into our 864 00:32:07,110 --> 00:32:04,080 culture certainly into our academics and 865 00:32:09,830 --> 00:32:07,120 that is that you know what if mind does 866 00:32:11,750 --> 00:32:09,840 not equal brain if your mind isn't 867 00:32:14,389 --> 00:32:11,760 solely a result 868 00:32:16,470 --> 00:32:14,399 of the chemical neural activity 869 00:32:18,470 --> 00:32:16,480 inside your brain right now then we got 870 00:32:20,470 --> 00:32:18,480 a huge measurement problem and we have 871 00:32:22,710 --> 00:32:20,480 to start asking questions like you know 872 00:32:24,470 --> 00:32:22,720 how many angels fit on the head of a pin 873 00:32:26,630 --> 00:32:24,480 those kind of questions that we do you 874 00:32:29,430 --> 00:32:26,640 know we left long ago because we 875 00:32:31,269 --> 00:32:29,440 realized where they take us but i really 876 00:32:33,430 --> 00:32:31,279 think i don't know how you get around it 877 00:32:36,230 --> 00:32:33,440 from a philosophical standpoint i think 878 00:32:38,549 --> 00:32:36,240 that's what's at stake with this mind 879 00:32:41,350 --> 00:32:38,559 equals mind equals brain problem 880 00:32:42,389 --> 00:32:41,360 well i can see i can see that 881 00:32:44,549 --> 00:32:42,399 what you're doing there is you're saying 882 00:32:46,710 --> 00:32:44,559 well look here's a there's a veil here 883 00:32:48,230 --> 00:32:46,720 and the stuff this side of the veil i 884 00:32:50,389 --> 00:32:48,240 can put my tape measure up against it 885 00:32:52,149 --> 00:32:50,399 and i can measure it but hey if there's 886 00:32:53,669 --> 00:32:52,159 stuff behind the veil and i can't i 887 00:32:55,830 --> 00:32:53,679 can't get my tape measure back there and 888 00:32:58,230 --> 00:32:55,840 do the measuring because it's the mind 889 00:32:59,830 --> 00:32:58,240 and the mind isn't physical even 890 00:33:02,389 --> 00:32:59,840 then there's a real problem about 891 00:33:04,549 --> 00:33:02,399 scientific investigation of that 892 00:33:06,389 --> 00:33:04,559 phenomenon but i don't think i'm saying 893 00:33:08,310 --> 00:33:06,399 that i think that's what stephen hawking 894 00:33:09,830 --> 00:33:08,320 is saying i think that's what 895 00:33:12,149 --> 00:33:09,840 richard dawkin is saying i think that's 896 00:33:14,230 --> 00:33:12,159 what a lot of people are saying her like 897 00:33:16,789 --> 00:33:14,240 hey don't really go there too far 898 00:33:18,389 --> 00:33:16,799 because you don't want to fully embrace 899 00:33:19,830 --> 00:33:18,399 what that means but tell me why you 900 00:33:23,029 --> 00:33:19,840 don't think that's 901 00:33:24,630 --> 00:33:23,039 well just because something 902 00:33:26,230 --> 00:33:24,640 is not 903 00:33:28,230 --> 00:33:26,240 observable 904 00:33:30,190 --> 00:33:28,240 um doesn't mean that it's not 905 00:33:33,110 --> 00:33:30,200 scientifically 906 00:33:34,470 --> 00:33:33,120 investigable and science deals with well 907 00:33:35,909 --> 00:33:34,480 hello 908 00:33:37,669 --> 00:33:35,919 wait a minute i don't think that's true 909 00:33:39,430 --> 00:33:37,679 tell me tell me how that could 910 00:33:41,269 --> 00:33:39,440 how could we measure something we can't 911 00:33:43,110 --> 00:33:41,279 observe well you can investigate things 912 00:33:44,950 --> 00:33:43,120 by investigating their effects you can't 913 00:33:46,710 --> 00:33:44,960 observe electrons 914 00:33:49,350 --> 00:33:46,720 you can't observe 915 00:33:52,470 --> 00:33:49,360 the distant past of this planet you 916 00:33:54,470 --> 00:33:52,480 cannot observe a living dinosaur 917 00:33:57,430 --> 00:33:54,480 um all of these things are beyond our 918 00:33:59,350 --> 00:33:57,440 ability to observe but we can still draw 919 00:34:01,350 --> 00:33:59,360 reasonable conclusions about these 920 00:34:02,630 --> 00:34:01,360 portions these unobserved portions of 921 00:34:03,990 --> 00:34:02,640 reality 922 00:34:06,630 --> 00:34:04,000 by 923 00:34:07,430 --> 00:34:06,640 thinking through the consequences 924 00:34:09,829 --> 00:34:07,440 of 925 00:34:12,149 --> 00:34:09,839 beliefs in such things if it's true that 926 00:34:15,030 --> 00:34:12,159 dinosaurs once roamed the earth then we 927 00:34:17,589 --> 00:34:15,040 should find certain things 928 00:34:19,270 --> 00:34:17,599 embedded in the ground now for example 929 00:34:21,430 --> 00:34:19,280 there should be certain clues that we 930 00:34:24,069 --> 00:34:21,440 should be able to discover if it's true 931 00:34:26,790 --> 00:34:24,079 that crystals have certain effects on 932 00:34:29,669 --> 00:34:26,800 people's psyches by some supernatural 933 00:34:31,510 --> 00:34:29,679 means we can do some experiments to see 934 00:34:33,030 --> 00:34:31,520 double blind experiments to see whether 935 00:34:35,669 --> 00:34:33,040 or not the crystals have those kinds of 936 00:34:38,069 --> 00:34:35,679 effects if prayer has the ability to 937 00:34:39,589 --> 00:34:38,079 cure people then we can do again 938 00:34:41,750 --> 00:34:39,599 double-blind experiments and they've 939 00:34:44,149 --> 00:34:41,760 been done to see whether petitionary 940 00:34:46,790 --> 00:34:44,159 prayer really does have the ability to 941 00:34:49,270 --> 00:34:46,800 cure heart patients so so just because 942 00:34:51,829 --> 00:34:49,280 the just because the phenomenon itself 943 00:34:53,750 --> 00:34:51,839 is behind the screen doesn't mean that 944 00:34:55,270 --> 00:34:53,760 you can't actually empirically 945 00:34:56,869 --> 00:34:55,280 investigate it and i thought that 946 00:35:00,310 --> 00:34:56,879 actually rupert sheldrake was very much 947 00:35:02,150 --> 00:35:00,320 in favor of that kind of investigation 948 00:35:04,950 --> 00:35:02,160 i think he is but i think what he's 949 00:35:06,710 --> 00:35:04,960 alluding to is that we have to be 950 00:35:08,870 --> 00:35:06,720 cautious in the same way you're talking 951 00:35:10,870 --> 00:35:08,880 about in a way that's why i like to 952 00:35:12,470 --> 00:35:10,880 juxtapose those two quotes yours and his 953 00:35:14,470 --> 00:35:12,480 because in a way you're talking about 954 00:35:16,630 --> 00:35:14,480 the same thing about sweeping mystery 955 00:35:18,069 --> 00:35:16,640 under the rug and what sheldrick is 956 00:35:21,270 --> 00:35:18,079 warning us is 957 00:35:23,910 --> 00:35:21,280 don't think that science isn't already 958 00:35:26,230 --> 00:35:23,920 sweeping a whole lot of mystery under 959 00:35:27,829 --> 00:35:26,240 the rug i i always think of the quote 960 00:35:29,990 --> 00:35:27,839 from the famous 961 00:35:31,990 --> 00:35:30,000 physicist richard feynman who says 962 00:35:34,950 --> 00:35:32,000 anyone who claims to understand quantum 963 00:35:38,390 --> 00:35:34,960 theory is either lying or crazy right so 964 00:35:40,790 --> 00:35:38,400 there's a whole lot of mystery that is 965 00:35:43,270 --> 00:35:40,800 at the core of physics as we understand 966 00:35:45,270 --> 00:35:43,280 it that we just conveniently sweep under 967 00:35:47,589 --> 00:35:45,280 the rug because we don't want to deal 968 00:35:49,670 --> 00:35:47,599 with it or as you put it we put it on 969 00:35:51,430 --> 00:35:49,680 the other side of the veil and say oh we 970 00:35:53,430 --> 00:35:51,440 can't really understand it but we can 971 00:35:55,430 --> 00:35:53,440 kind of fool around with measuring these 972 00:35:56,950 --> 00:35:55,440 effects when i think what you've really 973 00:35:59,829 --> 00:35:56,960 done is you've kind of switched the game 974 00:36:02,310 --> 00:35:59,839 here because the game was about 975 00:36:04,069 --> 00:36:02,320 that we have this closed loop system 976 00:36:06,069 --> 00:36:04,079 everything that is physical is 977 00:36:08,230 --> 00:36:06,079 manifested in a way that we can measure 978 00:36:10,150 --> 00:36:08,240 and measure it and if we change that 979 00:36:11,750 --> 00:36:10,160 assumption i really think we've kind of 980 00:36:12,630 --> 00:36:11,760 changed the game in a fundamental way 981 00:36:14,870 --> 00:36:12,640 but 982 00:36:17,030 --> 00:36:14,880 obviously you kind of see it somewhat 983 00:36:17,829 --> 00:36:17,040 differently i have no problem at all 984 00:36:21,430 --> 00:36:17,839 with 985 00:36:22,870 --> 00:36:21,440 acknowledging that some things are 986 00:36:24,829 --> 00:36:22,880 currently beyond our understanding and 987 00:36:27,910 --> 00:36:24,839 maybe in principle beyond our 988 00:36:29,670 --> 00:36:27,920 understanding um my problem is with 989 00:36:33,270 --> 00:36:29,680 those who 990 00:36:35,670 --> 00:36:33,280 when their belief in some phenomenon 991 00:36:37,510 --> 00:36:35,680 has been challenged 992 00:36:39,030 --> 00:36:37,520 they say 993 00:36:40,550 --> 00:36:39,040 you know there's a serious intellectual 994 00:36:42,230 --> 00:36:40,560 threat the evidence very strongly 995 00:36:44,069 --> 00:36:42,240 suggests that what they believe is not 996 00:36:46,069 --> 00:36:44,079 true say they believe in petitionary 997 00:36:48,550 --> 00:36:46,079 prayer or they believe that miracles 998 00:36:50,950 --> 00:36:48,560 have some so um crystals have some 999 00:36:52,870 --> 00:36:50,960 amazing effect on people's psyche and 1000 00:36:54,470 --> 00:36:52,880 the experiments are done and the 1001 00:36:56,550 --> 00:36:54,480 evidence is in and it looks very much as 1002 00:36:58,550 --> 00:36:56,560 if it's simply not true and they respond 1003 00:37:00,630 --> 00:36:58,560 by saying yes but there are more things 1004 00:37:02,710 --> 00:37:00,640 in heaven and hell than a dreamt of in 1005 00:37:04,390 --> 00:37:02,720 your philosophy correct that's what they 1006 00:37:06,150 --> 00:37:04,400 say at that point and what they're doing 1007 00:37:08,390 --> 00:37:06,160 now is they're using the veil as an 1008 00:37:09,990 --> 00:37:08,400 immunizing device to protect what they 1009 00:37:13,670 --> 00:37:10,000 believe 1010 00:37:15,270 --> 00:37:13,680 from any kind of threat and now that is 1011 00:37:17,990 --> 00:37:15,280 it seems to me intellectually very 1012 00:37:20,470 --> 00:37:18,000 dubious indeed to some extent we all do 1013 00:37:22,390 --> 00:37:20,480 that a little bit but the more you do it 1014 00:37:25,109 --> 00:37:22,400 the more vulnerable you become to 1015 00:37:28,069 --> 00:37:25,119 deceive by others and by yourself you 1016 00:37:29,589 --> 00:37:28,079 end up kidding yourself in the end so 1017 00:37:31,030 --> 00:37:29,599 it's that kind of appeal to mystery that 1018 00:37:33,109 --> 00:37:31,040 bothers me i have no problem with 1019 00:37:35,270 --> 00:37:33,119 mystery hey there are plenty of them and 1020 00:37:37,190 --> 00:37:35,280 they inspire us to keep looking and keep 1021 00:37:39,190 --> 00:37:37,200 searching and it may be that some will 1022 00:37:41,670 --> 00:37:39,200 never be solved and it may be that they 1023 00:37:45,190 --> 00:37:41,680 are necessarily unsolvable but let's not 1024 00:37:46,950 --> 00:37:45,200 use mystery as a kind of get out of jail 1025 00:37:48,710 --> 00:37:46,960 card whenever we find ourselves cornered 1026 00:37:49,750 --> 00:37:48,720 in an argument i mean that's that's not 1027 00:37:51,990 --> 00:37:49,760 all 1028 00:37:54,870 --> 00:37:52,000 no fair enough but as you know you're 1029 00:37:57,430 --> 00:37:54,880 also provost for the center for inquiry 1030 00:38:00,150 --> 00:37:57,440 in the uk which i'm not sure how it's 1031 00:38:01,430 --> 00:38:00,160 perceived in the uk but in the u.s is 1032 00:38:03,990 --> 00:38:01,440 known as 1033 00:38:07,030 --> 00:38:04,000 basically a debunking organization for 1034 00:38:10,069 --> 00:38:07,040 all manner of paranormal claims and that 1035 00:38:11,589 --> 00:38:10,079 kind of leads me into directly into this 1036 00:38:13,750 --> 00:38:11,599 last topic i want to talk to you about 1037 00:38:15,109 --> 00:38:13,760 in terms of philosophy of science and 1038 00:38:16,710 --> 00:38:15,119 gosh as you were saying that what just 1039 00:38:18,550 --> 00:38:16,720 kept ringing through my ears is what i 1040 00:38:20,310 --> 00:38:18,560 hear all the time this idea of 1041 00:38:22,150 --> 00:38:20,320 extraordinary claims require 1042 00:38:25,829 --> 00:38:22,160 extraordinary proof i mean you want to 1043 00:38:27,750 --> 00:38:25,839 talk about sweeping mystery sweeping 1044 00:38:32,310 --> 00:38:27,760 evidence that you don't like under the 1045 00:38:35,190 --> 00:38:32,320 rug here is the mantra that the whole 1046 00:38:36,230 --> 00:38:35,200 center for inquiry crowd pulls out i 1047 00:38:38,470 --> 00:38:36,240 mean 1048 00:38:41,910 --> 00:38:38,480 i guess i should start with that 1049 00:38:43,109 --> 00:38:41,920 i see that as just an intellectually 1050 00:38:45,510 --> 00:38:43,119 feeble 1051 00:38:48,230 --> 00:38:45,520 kind of pronouncement extraordinary 1052 00:38:53,030 --> 00:38:48,240 claims require extraordinary proof that 1053 00:38:56,550 --> 00:38:54,710 why do you think that 1054 00:38:59,510 --> 00:38:56,560 well well we've built this whole 1055 00:39:01,829 --> 00:38:59,520 institution of science the whole process 1056 00:39:04,390 --> 00:39:01,839 of peer review the whole process of 1057 00:39:08,390 --> 00:39:04,400 self-correction around this idea that 1058 00:39:11,109 --> 00:39:08,400 that we will all together discover what 1059 00:39:14,470 --> 00:39:11,119 is real what is not real what is 1060 00:39:17,109 --> 00:39:14,480 extraordinary what is not extraordinary 1061 00:39:19,270 --> 00:39:17,119 so then the idea that that kind of after 1062 00:39:21,510 --> 00:39:19,280 the fact after the results come in we 1063 00:39:23,349 --> 00:39:21,520 say you know that's pretty interesting 1064 00:39:26,230 --> 00:39:23,359 results but i deem that to be 1065 00:39:28,950 --> 00:39:26,240 extraordinary therefore you need an 1066 00:39:31,670 --> 00:39:28,960 extra level of proof on that i i i just 1067 00:39:33,109 --> 00:39:31,680 think is is just silly 1068 00:39:34,470 --> 00:39:33,119 oh okay i think that's where you're 1069 00:39:36,870 --> 00:39:34,480 coming from well the way i have 1070 00:39:38,710 --> 00:39:36,880 understood uh that principle 1071 00:39:40,950 --> 00:39:38,720 extraordinary claims require 1072 00:39:44,790 --> 00:39:40,960 extraordinary evidence is 1073 00:39:46,710 --> 00:39:44,800 that well i mean suppose suppose um 1074 00:39:49,430 --> 00:39:46,720 i tell you that over there 1075 00:39:52,069 --> 00:39:49,440 um i've got uh 1076 00:39:54,710 --> 00:39:52,079 a mobile phone and a cup okay 1077 00:39:56,950 --> 00:39:54,720 um and i do this there's the mobile 1078 00:39:58,710 --> 00:39:56,960 phone in the cup um you're gonna go hey 1079 00:40:00,950 --> 00:39:58,720 yeah that's good enough for me 1080 00:40:03,349 --> 00:40:00,960 steve's got a mobile phone and a cup if 1081 00:40:05,030 --> 00:40:03,359 i now wheel out a um a fairy which i may 1082 00:40:06,310 --> 00:40:05,040 dance on the end of my finger and i go 1083 00:40:08,069 --> 00:40:06,320 there you go ferry on the end of my 1084 00:40:09,430 --> 00:40:08,079 finger okay are you gonna go yeah 1085 00:40:11,190 --> 00:40:09,440 steve's got a fury on the end of his 1086 00:40:14,710 --> 00:40:11,200 finger i'll just take his that fair 1087 00:40:16,870 --> 00:40:14,720 enough i'll i'll i'll accept that while 1088 00:40:18,230 --> 00:40:16,880 on on this on the basis of the same kind 1089 00:40:20,550 --> 00:40:18,240 of evidence that i accept that he's got 1090 00:40:22,390 --> 00:40:20,560 a cup on my mobile phone i bet you would 1091 00:40:23,829 --> 00:40:22,400 not sure sure but we're talking about 1092 00:40:25,510 --> 00:40:23,839 we're talking about science here we're 1093 00:40:27,510 --> 00:40:25,520 talking about peer review here's the 1094 00:40:29,270 --> 00:40:27,520 example that i i sent you and i have 1095 00:40:31,829 --> 00:40:29,280 personal experience with because he told 1096 00:40:34,310 --> 00:40:31,839 it to me and we discussed it on this 1097 00:40:36,870 --> 00:40:34,320 show and that's british psychologist and 1098 00:40:39,510 --> 00:40:36,880 parapsychology critic richard wiseman 1099 00:40:42,310 --> 00:40:39,520 who has investigated probably more of 1100 00:40:44,230 --> 00:40:42,320 these paranormal parapsychology 1101 00:40:46,870 --> 00:40:44,240 claims like telepathy than just about 1102 00:40:49,349 --> 00:40:46,880 anybody else and here's his quote 1103 00:40:51,910 --> 00:40:49,359 i agree that by the standards of any 1104 00:40:54,390 --> 00:40:51,920 other area of science that remote 1105 00:40:55,589 --> 00:40:54,400 viewing and he later added in this quote 1106 00:40:57,990 --> 00:40:55,599 esp 1107 00:40:59,990 --> 00:40:58,000 is proven but that begs the question do 1108 00:41:02,710 --> 00:41:00,000 we need higher standards of evidence 1109 00:41:04,950 --> 00:41:02,720 when we study the paranormal so stephen 1110 00:41:06,790 --> 00:41:04,960 this is not you know the fairy in the 1111 00:41:09,270 --> 00:41:06,800 cup over here this is a guy who's 1112 00:41:11,349 --> 00:41:09,280 reviewed hundreds of peer-reviewed 1113 00:41:14,150 --> 00:41:11,359 papers and saying you know what 1114 00:41:17,270 --> 00:41:14,160 it's good enough for any other field but 1115 00:41:18,109 --> 00:41:17,280 you know what not good enough because of 1116 00:41:19,670 --> 00:41:18,119 the 1117 00:41:23,030 --> 00:41:19,680 groundbreaking 1118 00:41:25,109 --> 00:41:23,040 kind of upset it would make for science 1119 00:41:26,870 --> 00:41:25,119 i think this is the best evidence i 1120 00:41:31,030 --> 00:41:26,880 could give you for my claim about 1121 00:41:35,990 --> 00:41:31,040 scientific materialism being woven into 1122 00:41:39,430 --> 00:41:37,910 presumably you wouldn't accept you know 1123 00:41:41,190 --> 00:41:39,440 if i stick my finger out there and there 1124 00:41:43,030 --> 00:41:41,200 appears to be a finger a sort of fairy 1125 00:41:44,950 --> 00:41:43,040 spinning around on the end of it you're 1126 00:41:46,390 --> 00:41:44,960 going to be very very suspicious you're 1127 00:41:48,069 --> 00:41:46,400 not just going to say 1128 00:41:51,670 --> 00:41:48,079 yeah steven's proved to me that there 1129 00:41:54,309 --> 00:41:51,680 are fairies uh you're gonna require 1130 00:41:55,990 --> 00:41:54,319 a much more investigation before you 1131 00:41:57,750 --> 00:41:56,000 take my word for it that there really is 1132 00:41:59,910 --> 00:41:57,760 a fairies uh spinning around on the end 1133 00:42:00,870 --> 00:41:59,920 of my finger and why is that it's 1134 00:42:01,990 --> 00:42:00,880 because 1135 00:42:03,990 --> 00:42:02,000 you know 1136 00:42:06,470 --> 00:42:04,000 the the prior probability that anything 1137 00:42:08,870 --> 00:42:06,480 like a theory exists is very very low 1138 00:42:10,390 --> 00:42:08,880 indeed knowing what we do you know given 1139 00:42:12,150 --> 00:42:10,400 our background 1140 00:42:13,670 --> 00:42:12,160 you you don't even believe this you 1141 00:42:17,270 --> 00:42:13,680 don't even believe this yourself again 1142 00:42:21,030 --> 00:42:17,280 the quote is by by the standards of any 1143 00:42:24,470 --> 00:42:21,040 other area of science this is proven he 1144 00:42:27,270 --> 00:42:24,480 is talking about creating another level 1145 00:42:30,150 --> 00:42:27,280 of proof a completely arbitrary level of 1146 00:42:32,470 --> 00:42:30,160 proof based on his beliefs of what is 1147 00:42:35,430 --> 00:42:32,480 extraordinary in terms of a claim and 1148 00:42:37,589 --> 00:42:35,440 extraordinary in terms of proof 1149 00:42:39,750 --> 00:42:37,599 there's no way to intellectually defend 1150 00:42:41,589 --> 00:42:39,760 this statement it's but it is 1151 00:42:43,349 --> 00:42:41,599 there is because look i mean when the 1152 00:42:44,870 --> 00:42:43,359 scientist what the scientist is there 1153 00:42:47,270 --> 00:42:44,880 are certain things that the scientist is 1154 00:42:48,950 --> 00:42:47,280 going to take as rig you know um 1155 00:42:50,230 --> 00:42:48,960 he's going to take it that the dial 1156 00:42:51,670 --> 00:42:50,240 really does you know that really is 1157 00:42:52,710 --> 00:42:51,680 number one on the dial he can see it 1158 00:42:55,030 --> 00:42:52,720 right there 1159 00:42:57,510 --> 00:42:55,040 um that that that's not going to be a 1160 00:42:59,349 --> 00:42:57,520 problem so far so far as uh he's 1161 00:43:01,910 --> 00:42:59,359 concerned or she is concerned it's not 1162 00:43:04,309 --> 00:43:01,920 being sexist about this okay so there 1163 00:43:05,670 --> 00:43:04,319 are certain things that uh 1164 00:43:07,910 --> 00:43:05,680 we're going to take on the basis of 1165 00:43:09,190 --> 00:43:07,920 that's just how things appear to be and 1166 00:43:11,190 --> 00:43:09,200 scientists do that even in the 1167 00:43:12,790 --> 00:43:11,200 laboratory they're going to do that 1168 00:43:14,150 --> 00:43:12,800 although they'll hopefully go away and 1169 00:43:15,510 --> 00:43:14,160 repeat the experiment and other people 1170 00:43:16,470 --> 00:43:15,520 will do the same kind of thing but again 1171 00:43:19,190 --> 00:43:16,480 they'll just look at the doll and say 1172 00:43:21,750 --> 00:43:19,200 yeah number one okay let's carry on so 1173 00:43:24,150 --> 00:43:21,760 it's not it's it's not the extent to 1174 00:43:26,950 --> 00:43:24,160 which we raise the evidential bar 1175 00:43:28,950 --> 00:43:26,960 depends on 1176 00:43:32,309 --> 00:43:28,960 just how 1177 00:43:35,190 --> 00:43:32,319 extraordinary the claim is how unlikely 1178 00:43:36,950 --> 00:43:35,200 how likely it is that we would 1179 00:43:40,069 --> 00:43:36,960 have the evidence if the claim is true 1180 00:43:42,309 --> 00:43:40,079 and how unlikely it would be that we 1181 00:43:44,390 --> 00:43:42,319 would have the evidence if the claim 1182 00:43:46,150 --> 00:43:44,400 wasn't true but isn't that what science 1183 00:43:48,069 --> 00:43:46,160 is doing isn't that what science is 1184 00:43:50,069 --> 00:43:48,079 doing all the time isn't that what the 1185 00:43:52,870 --> 00:43:50,079 peer review process is doing is 1186 00:43:54,790 --> 00:43:52,880 determining what evidence we already 1187 00:43:55,990 --> 00:43:54,800 have as our base what new evidence we 1188 00:43:57,270 --> 00:43:56,000 should consider 1189 00:43:58,790 --> 00:43:57,280 why 1190 00:44:00,150 --> 00:43:58,800 maybe your maybe your view is that you 1191 00:44:01,510 --> 00:44:00,160 know there is already an awful lot of 1192 00:44:04,309 --> 00:44:01,520 evidence in 1193 00:44:06,150 --> 00:44:04,319 for the existence of psychic powers uh 1194 00:44:08,470 --> 00:44:06,160 say enough evidence that by the 1195 00:44:10,790 --> 00:44:08,480 standards of any other area of science 1196 00:44:12,790 --> 00:44:10,800 it's proven those are are wise men's 1197 00:44:14,069 --> 00:44:12,800 words yeah that's true 1198 00:44:16,150 --> 00:44:14,079 i can't comment on that because i'm not 1199 00:44:18,069 --> 00:44:16,160 an expert on that area of science but 1200 00:44:20,230 --> 00:44:18,079 let's suppose that that's true um i 1201 00:44:21,910 --> 00:44:20,240 guess what wiseman is 1202 00:44:23,990 --> 00:44:21,920 saying here i mean and that might be 1203 00:44:26,790 --> 00:44:24,000 true for what i know um 1204 00:44:28,550 --> 00:44:26,800 and it's not that i would i would 1205 00:44:30,390 --> 00:44:28,560 always refuse to believe that there was 1206 00:44:32,790 --> 00:44:30,400 psychic powers as a matter of fact i 1207 00:44:36,470 --> 00:44:32,800 don't um but i'm certainly open to 1208 00:44:37,990 --> 00:44:36,480 persuasion but i know for example that 1209 00:44:40,630 --> 00:44:38,000 scientists 1210 00:44:43,349 --> 00:44:40,640 can be a little bit unreliable when it 1211 00:44:46,069 --> 00:44:43,359 comes to investigating psychic phenomena 1212 00:44:48,550 --> 00:44:46,079 they have been duped they had their it's 1213 00:44:50,790 --> 00:44:48,560 on record it has been established that 1214 00:44:53,349 --> 00:44:50,800 scientists are really really good when 1215 00:44:55,270 --> 00:44:53,359 it comes to chemicals in a petri dish 1216 00:44:57,349 --> 00:44:55,280 but when it comes to a couple of people 1217 00:44:59,589 --> 00:44:57,359 in front of them they can they are 1218 00:45:01,829 --> 00:44:59,599 vulnerable to the same kind of 1219 00:45:03,750 --> 00:45:01,839 moves into seeds that the rest of us are 1220 00:45:05,910 --> 00:45:03,760 it turns out they don't have any special 1221 00:45:08,790 --> 00:45:05,920 expertise when it comes to investigating 1222 00:45:10,710 --> 00:45:08,800 someone like yuri gellar for example it 1223 00:45:12,230 --> 00:45:10,720 turns out that they are they will fall 1224 00:45:13,510 --> 00:45:12,240 for the same tricks as the man in the 1225 00:45:16,069 --> 00:45:13,520 street so 1226 00:45:18,470 --> 00:45:16,079 you have to be extra extra specially 1227 00:45:20,470 --> 00:45:18,480 careful when it comes to investigating 1228 00:45:21,750 --> 00:45:20,480 those kinds of things and 1229 00:45:23,750 --> 00:45:21,760 i i can't believe that you would 1230 00:45:27,750 --> 00:45:23,760 disagree with me about that would you 1231 00:45:30,870 --> 00:45:27,760 intellectual black hole alert dr law 1232 00:45:33,430 --> 00:45:30,880 this is exactly what you preach against 1233 00:45:36,309 --> 00:45:33,440 in is that we are going to layer on top 1234 00:45:38,710 --> 00:45:36,319 of this without any proof without any 1235 00:45:41,109 --> 00:45:38,720 evidence i mean if that's your claim 1236 00:45:43,670 --> 00:45:41,119 then someone needs to prove that as 1237 00:45:45,510 --> 00:45:43,680 they've tried to do so many times and as 1238 00:45:47,270 --> 00:45:45,520 the social scientists 1239 00:45:48,870 --> 00:45:47,280 well wait a minute they really we could 1240 00:45:51,190 --> 00:45:48,880 get into that evidence and talk about 1241 00:45:53,430 --> 00:45:51,200 that but i think what you'd find is that 1242 00:45:54,109 --> 00:45:53,440 all the work that's been done suggests 1243 00:45:57,349 --> 00:45:54,119 that 1244 00:46:00,550 --> 00:45:57,359 parapsychology stands above virtually 1245 00:46:03,589 --> 00:46:00,560 every other area of science in terms of 1246 00:46:06,309 --> 00:46:03,599 controlling for these kinds of 1247 00:46:08,790 --> 00:46:06,319 lack of controls because they've been 1248 00:46:10,630 --> 00:46:08,800 under such scrutiny for the last 50 1249 00:46:12,870 --> 00:46:10,640 years that they're more aware of this 1250 00:46:15,190 --> 00:46:12,880 than anyone else that's what the hard 1251 00:46:17,990 --> 00:46:15,200 date that's what the hard data tells us 1252 00:46:19,750 --> 00:46:18,000 but i i again i just think the idea that 1253 00:46:22,950 --> 00:46:19,760 that we need to 1254 00:46:25,349 --> 00:46:22,960 kind of layer on top of science 1255 00:46:28,790 --> 00:46:25,359 the the center for a lot of these people 1256 00:46:30,550 --> 00:46:28,800 are investigating and finding nothing 1257 00:46:32,390 --> 00:46:30,560 they can't replicate the experiments 1258 00:46:33,990 --> 00:46:32,400 they do not get the same results when 1259 00:46:37,190 --> 00:46:34,000 they repeat the experiments that 1260 00:46:38,470 --> 00:46:37,200 supposedly show the psychic effect there 1261 00:46:41,349 --> 00:46:38,480 is not the repeating that you would 1262 00:46:44,230 --> 00:46:41,359 expect and so at the very least you 1263 00:46:45,829 --> 00:46:44,240 should be a little bit skeptical here 1264 00:46:46,790 --> 00:46:45,839 you know you shouldn't just assume that 1265 00:46:48,309 --> 00:46:46,800 the reason they're not getting the 1266 00:46:49,349 --> 00:46:48,319 result with the results when wiseman 1267 00:46:50,470 --> 00:46:49,359 does the experiment he doesn't get the 1268 00:46:51,670 --> 00:46:50,480 results when chris french does the 1269 00:46:53,589 --> 00:46:51,680 experiment he doesn't get the results 1270 00:46:55,349 --> 00:46:53,599 when randy does the experiment he 1271 00:46:58,870 --> 00:46:55,359 doesn't get the results but rihanna 1272 00:47:01,430 --> 00:46:58,880 randy you really want to throw randy in 1273 00:47:03,430 --> 00:47:01,440 into a serious scientific debate and 1274 00:47:05,190 --> 00:47:03,440 again if that's your claim if that's 1275 00:47:07,349 --> 00:47:05,200 your claim then you would you would have 1276 00:47:10,230 --> 00:47:07,359 to back that you would have to back that 1277 00:47:12,790 --> 00:47:10,240 up i think we're going to get way into 1278 00:47:14,230 --> 00:47:12,800 uh you know the details of those 1279 00:47:16,630 --> 00:47:14,240 experiments which we've done on this 1280 00:47:19,910 --> 00:47:16,640 show many times but it's really i think 1281 00:47:21,750 --> 00:47:19,920 uh probably outside of the the aim of 1282 00:47:23,750 --> 00:47:21,760 having you on and talking about the 1283 00:47:26,230 --> 00:47:23,760 philosophy of it which i think you've 1284 00:47:28,470 --> 00:47:26,240 handled in a in an admirable way and 1285 00:47:29,510 --> 00:47:28,480 i've used up i think about all of our 1286 00:47:31,030 --> 00:47:29,520 time 1287 00:47:32,870 --> 00:47:31,040 let's switch gears for a minute if we 1288 00:47:35,990 --> 00:47:32,880 could and get off 1289 00:47:38,230 --> 00:47:36,000 oh go go ahead no no please punish it 1290 00:47:40,790 --> 00:47:38,240 the principle that extraordinary claims 1291 00:47:43,750 --> 00:47:40,800 require extraordinary evidence i think 1292 00:47:45,270 --> 00:47:43,760 actually is is self-evidently true if 1293 00:47:47,990 --> 00:47:45,280 you think about it in the right kind of 1294 00:47:49,670 --> 00:47:48,000 way and in fact you if you understand it 1295 00:47:51,990 --> 00:47:49,680 in the right kind of way certainly if i 1296 00:47:53,190 --> 00:47:52,000 claim to have a thing a fairy you know 1297 00:47:54,870 --> 00:47:53,200 in front of you and i show you what 1298 00:47:57,510 --> 00:47:54,880 appears to be a fairy on your little tv 1299 00:47:58,790 --> 00:47:57,520 screen there dancing away on my hand you 1300 00:48:00,390 --> 00:47:58,800 you're not just you're not going to take 1301 00:48:01,670 --> 00:48:00,400 that at face value in the same way that 1302 00:48:03,910 --> 00:48:01,680 you would take it that i have a cup of 1303 00:48:05,990 --> 00:48:03,920 my hand clearly as the claim becomes 1304 00:48:08,150 --> 00:48:06,000 more and more extraordinary so the 1305 00:48:09,589 --> 00:48:08,160 evidential bar has to be raised and we 1306 00:48:11,829 --> 00:48:09,599 all know that and when it comes to 1307 00:48:13,910 --> 00:48:11,839 claims about psychic powers and so on 1308 00:48:16,870 --> 00:48:13,920 these are very very extraordinary claims 1309 00:48:18,630 --> 00:48:16,880 they do not fit in with our theory our 1310 00:48:20,150 --> 00:48:18,640 best understanding of how the universe 1311 00:48:21,349 --> 00:48:20,160 works and so if you're going to make 1312 00:48:23,589 --> 00:48:21,359 those claims you're going to have to 1313 00:48:25,589 --> 00:48:23,599 have better evidence than the kind of 1314 00:48:27,829 --> 00:48:25,599 evidence that you would already or you 1315 00:48:29,670 --> 00:48:27,839 know ordinarily expect to have the 1316 00:48:31,190 --> 00:48:29,680 principle that extraordinary claims 1317 00:48:33,109 --> 00:48:31,200 require extraordinary evidence seems to 1318 00:48:33,990 --> 00:48:33,119 me a very sensible 1319 00:48:36,470 --> 00:48:34,000 client 1320 00:48:38,790 --> 00:48:36,480 well well it it seems sensible in the 1321 00:48:40,470 --> 00:48:38,800 same way that communism seems sensible 1322 00:48:43,430 --> 00:48:40,480 and that we should share everything 1323 00:48:45,430 --> 00:48:43,440 among everyone except the devil of 1324 00:48:48,549 --> 00:48:45,440 course is in the details and that's who 1325 00:48:51,430 --> 00:48:48,559 decides what is shared with whom and so 1326 00:48:53,670 --> 00:48:51,440 is the problem with extraordinary claims 1327 00:48:55,829 --> 00:48:53,680 require extraordinary proof who will 1328 00:48:57,190 --> 00:48:55,839 decide i agree with you know that's good 1329 00:48:58,230 --> 00:48:57,200 yes you're coming on board with the 1330 00:49:00,549 --> 00:48:58,240 clapping 1331 00:49:02,549 --> 00:49:00,559 well i i guess i guess i'm coming on 1332 00:49:04,870 --> 00:49:02,559 board if we had this 1333 00:49:07,190 --> 00:49:04,880 omnipotent all-knowing 1334 00:49:09,430 --> 00:49:07,200 being that could decide what is 1335 00:49:11,589 --> 00:49:09,440 extraordinary in terms of claim and what 1336 00:49:13,349 --> 00:49:11,599 is extraordinary in terms of proof but i 1337 00:49:15,990 --> 00:49:13,359 would submit to you that that's why 1338 00:49:17,750 --> 00:49:16,000 we've built the scientific institutions 1339 00:49:21,510 --> 00:49:17,760 that we have that's why we have peer 1340 00:49:23,990 --> 00:49:21,520 review that's why we have a a a college 1341 00:49:25,750 --> 00:49:24,000 of academics who collectively create 1342 00:49:28,069 --> 00:49:25,760 this body of knowledge they are 1343 00:49:30,309 --> 00:49:28,079 constantly in the business of 1344 00:49:33,190 --> 00:49:30,319 extraordinary claims and extraordinary 1345 00:49:35,829 --> 00:49:33,200 proof and the notion that that we could 1346 00:49:37,750 --> 00:49:35,839 as a kind this armchair quarterback say 1347 00:49:40,150 --> 00:49:37,760 hey that area over there is 1348 00:49:43,829 --> 00:49:40,160 extraordinary i think is absurd i think 1349 00:49:45,990 --> 00:49:43,839 there's a thousands of little areas of 1350 00:49:47,990 --> 00:49:46,000 inquiry of science that we know nothing 1351 00:49:49,910 --> 00:49:48,000 about that if we went into we might 1352 00:49:52,230 --> 00:49:49,920 think wow that is extraordinary we just 1353 00:49:55,030 --> 00:49:52,240 don't know anything about it psychics 1354 00:49:57,910 --> 00:49:55,040 because they're on tv strike us as 1355 00:50:00,150 --> 00:49:57,920 extraordinary but to the researchers who 1356 00:50:02,069 --> 00:50:00,160 are in that field who are publishing in 1357 00:50:04,549 --> 00:50:02,079 those peer-reviewed journals who are 1358 00:50:06,230 --> 00:50:04,559 subjecting themselves to the criticism 1359 00:50:07,750 --> 00:50:06,240 of the best critics 1360 00:50:09,510 --> 00:50:07,760 are 1361 00:50:11,270 --> 00:50:09,520 some being 1362 00:50:13,109 --> 00:50:11,280 well some always i mean 1363 00:50:15,430 --> 00:50:13,119 some isn't really a qualifier here if 1364 00:50:16,309 --> 00:50:15,440 it's a qualifier all the time i'm just 1365 00:50:18,470 --> 00:50:16,319 saying 1366 00:50:21,109 --> 00:50:18,480 how would we layer on top of this this 1367 00:50:23,829 --> 00:50:21,119 notion of extraordinary how would we how 1368 00:50:26,470 --> 00:50:23,839 is the center for inquiry in any 1369 00:50:29,349 --> 00:50:26,480 position to be the arbitrary 1370 00:50:30,950 --> 00:50:29,359 of what is extraordinary even the people 1371 00:50:35,030 --> 00:50:30,960 doing the research think these claims 1372 00:50:38,230 --> 00:50:35,040 are extraordinary they will they will be 1373 00:50:39,910 --> 00:50:38,240 trumpeting from the rooftops if it turns 1374 00:50:41,589 --> 00:50:39,920 out they really can establish that some 1375 00:50:44,630 --> 00:50:41,599 people have psychic powers that is 1376 00:50:47,109 --> 00:50:44,640 absolutely extraordinary and you know it 1377 00:50:49,349 --> 00:50:47,119 it's exciting in a way that some other 1378 00:50:52,390 --> 00:50:49,359 rather more mundane scientific discovery 1379 00:50:54,309 --> 00:50:52,400 is not these are extraordinary claims 1380 00:50:55,589 --> 00:50:54,319 and it may be that we can establish that 1381 00:50:57,430 --> 00:50:55,599 they are true and it may be that the 1382 00:50:59,270 --> 00:50:57,440 extraordinary evidence is in hey i don't 1383 00:51:00,950 --> 00:50:59,280 know but so far so far as i'm aware 1384 00:51:03,190 --> 00:51:00,960 there are very many people working in 1385 00:51:05,910 --> 00:51:03,200 this area working very very hard who are 1386 00:51:07,349 --> 00:51:05,920 genuinely open-minded who just can't see 1387 00:51:09,109 --> 00:51:07,359 the evidence and they don't get the 1388 00:51:11,349 --> 00:51:09,119 results that other people do when they 1389 00:51:12,710 --> 00:51:11,359 repeat the experiments and on that basis 1390 00:51:14,549 --> 00:51:12,720 then i think 1391 00:51:16,790 --> 00:51:14,559 you know the evidence just isn't there 1392 00:51:19,270 --> 00:51:16,800 at this point but now we're moving from 1393 00:51:21,750 --> 00:51:19,280 talking about philosophy to talking 1394 00:51:23,750 --> 00:51:21,760 about the evidence i'm all for talking 1395 00:51:26,470 --> 00:51:23,760 about the evidence but i don't think 1396 00:51:28,710 --> 00:51:26,480 that's a debate that really you will 1397 00:51:30,390 --> 00:51:28,720 stand up very well in because we've 1398 00:51:33,030 --> 00:51:30,400 looked at the evidence the evidence has 1399 00:51:35,349 --> 00:51:33,040 been published the evidence isn't as 1400 00:51:38,630 --> 00:51:35,359 you've been led to believe the evidence 1401 00:51:41,990 --> 00:51:38,640 is as richard wiseman has said right 1402 00:51:45,270 --> 00:51:42,000 here that by any other area of science 1403 00:51:48,069 --> 00:51:45,280 it's proven that really is the dirty 1404 00:51:50,150 --> 00:51:48,079 dark secret here but it gets spun in a 1405 00:51:51,430 --> 00:51:50,160 different way so if you want to talk 1406 00:51:53,910 --> 00:51:51,440 about evidence we can talk about 1407 00:51:55,829 --> 00:51:53,920 evidence all day long i've talked to 1408 00:51:57,510 --> 00:51:55,839 dozens and dozens of these guys and had 1409 00:51:59,589 --> 00:51:57,520 them on the show and hashed that out 1410 00:52:00,950 --> 00:51:59,599 including yeah i mean think about that 1411 00:52:02,829 --> 00:52:00,960 think of it think think of it like this 1412 00:52:06,309 --> 00:52:02,839 suppose somebody says look 1413 00:52:08,150 --> 00:52:06,319 um i've got a i've got a machine here 1414 00:52:09,990 --> 00:52:08,160 that uh 1415 00:52:12,309 --> 00:52:10,000 that's i don't know it's it's it's 1416 00:52:14,069 --> 00:52:12,319 really good at uh lifting heavy weights 1417 00:52:15,910 --> 00:52:14,079 and we say okay 1418 00:52:17,030 --> 00:52:15,920 yeah that's that that's not particularly 1419 00:52:19,510 --> 00:52:17,040 surprising not a particularly 1420 00:52:21,750 --> 00:52:19,520 extraordinary claim we'll test it let's 1421 00:52:23,109 --> 00:52:21,760 let's produce a rig and an experiment 1422 00:52:25,670 --> 00:52:23,119 we'll test it in the lab to see if it 1423 00:52:26,630 --> 00:52:25,680 really does the thing and by golly by 1424 00:52:28,630 --> 00:52:26,640 golly 1425 00:52:30,790 --> 00:52:28,640 it does it you know it passes the test 1426 00:52:32,150 --> 00:52:30,800 okay so now this guy comes in he says 1427 00:52:34,710 --> 00:52:32,160 i've got this other machine it's 1428 00:52:36,870 --> 00:52:34,720 perpetual motion machine uh he rules it 1429 00:52:38,710 --> 00:52:36,880 in he says now just do the same 1430 00:52:40,230 --> 00:52:38,720 experiment i don't want you to change 1431 00:52:41,750 --> 00:52:40,240 anything the same standards that you 1432 00:52:43,510 --> 00:52:41,760 applied to my first machine i want you 1433 00:52:45,510 --> 00:52:43,520 to apply those exact same standards to 1434 00:52:47,990 --> 00:52:45,520 this machine and if it passes then you 1435 00:52:52,069 --> 00:52:48,000 have to tell the world that my perpetual 1436 00:52:54,630 --> 00:52:52,079 motion machine really works um i don't 1437 00:52:56,549 --> 00:52:54,640 think that would be fair 1438 00:52:58,549 --> 00:52:56,559 because the first machine doesn't is not 1439 00:53:00,470 --> 00:52:58,559 revolutionary and extraordinary in the 1440 00:53:02,630 --> 00:53:00,480 way that the second machine is that 1441 00:53:05,030 --> 00:53:02,640 second machine has to be investigated 1442 00:53:07,109 --> 00:53:05,040 much more carefully and the standards 1443 00:53:08,950 --> 00:53:07,119 applied have to be far more rigorous 1444 00:53:10,630 --> 00:53:08,960 because of the truly extraordinary 1445 00:53:12,069 --> 00:53:10,640 nature of the claim that's being 1446 00:53:13,349 --> 00:53:12,079 presented to us that's what 1447 00:53:15,109 --> 00:53:13,359 extraordinary claims require 1448 00:53:17,990 --> 00:53:15,119 extraordinary evidence means and it's 1449 00:53:20,710 --> 00:53:18,000 true well well stephen i i i just beg to 1450 00:53:23,270 --> 00:53:20,720 differ i i don't think you're intimately 1451 00:53:25,030 --> 00:53:23,280 familiar with the data dr dean rayden is 1452 00:53:27,510 --> 00:53:25,040 someone i just interviewed on the last 1453 00:53:29,109 --> 00:53:27,520 episode of skeptico i invite him to 1454 00:53:30,710 --> 00:53:29,119 contribute to think i published his 1455 00:53:32,950 --> 00:53:30,720 stuff that's great i mean here is 1456 00:53:34,870 --> 00:53:32,960 someone let's let's let's just dive into 1457 00:53:38,230 --> 00:53:34,880 dip into then a little bit of the 1458 00:53:40,470 --> 00:53:38,240 details of some data you know so he ran 1459 00:53:42,309 --> 00:53:40,480 this experiment called a pre-sentiment 1460 00:53:44,230 --> 00:53:42,319 experiment and the reason he set this up 1461 00:53:45,990 --> 00:53:44,240 is because it's a common experiment 1462 00:53:49,109 --> 00:53:46,000 that's been run on 1463 00:53:52,390 --> 00:53:49,119 freshman college students for decades 1464 00:53:54,470 --> 00:53:52,400 and that's that you hook them up to 1465 00:53:56,470 --> 00:53:54,480 some kind of biometric device various 1466 00:53:58,309 --> 00:53:56,480 different ones to measure their reaction 1467 00:54:01,510 --> 00:53:58,319 and you flash a picture on the computer 1468 00:54:03,349 --> 00:54:01,520 screen and it's either a a non 1469 00:54:05,190 --> 00:54:03,359 you know exciting picture of just a 1470 00:54:07,030 --> 00:54:05,200 pastoral scene or something like that or 1471 00:54:08,630 --> 00:54:07,040 it's something very provocative like sex 1472 00:54:10,870 --> 00:54:08,640 or violence or something like that and 1473 00:54:13,910 --> 00:54:10,880 then he wanted to measure the reaction 1474 00:54:15,190 --> 00:54:13,920 from those people what he found was a 1475 00:54:17,030 --> 00:54:15,200 reaction 1476 00:54:19,589 --> 00:54:17,040 before 1477 00:54:22,390 --> 00:54:19,599 the photo was even selected by the 1478 00:54:25,109 --> 00:54:22,400 computer it's a very small reaction but 1479 00:54:26,870 --> 00:54:25,119 it's repeatable he has repeated this 1480 00:54:29,349 --> 00:54:26,880 experiment stephen 1481 00:54:31,990 --> 00:54:29,359 uh over 50 times 1482 00:54:34,710 --> 00:54:32,000 in seven different labs it's been 1483 00:54:36,230 --> 00:54:34,720 repeated around the world and not just 1484 00:54:38,390 --> 00:54:36,240 by him 1485 00:54:41,910 --> 00:54:38,400 by other people by other people by other 1486 00:54:44,230 --> 00:54:41,920 people yes by him dozens of times by 1487 00:54:46,549 --> 00:54:44,240 other labs other than him at least nine 1488 00:54:48,790 --> 00:54:46,559 times if by the on the last count it's 1489 00:54:51,910 --> 00:54:48,800 been published in numerous peer-reviewed 1490 00:54:54,630 --> 00:54:51,920 journals so you know here is an example 1491 00:54:56,790 --> 00:54:54,640 of the kind of evidence that richard 1492 00:54:59,829 --> 00:54:56,800 wiseman is talking about when he says 1493 00:55:01,510 --> 00:54:59,839 hey by any other measure of science a 1494 00:55:04,069 --> 00:55:01,520 guy doesn't experiment repeats the 1495 00:55:06,870 --> 00:55:04,079 experiment makes the experiment public 1496 00:55:08,710 --> 00:55:06,880 this is proof it's just not accepted 1497 00:55:11,190 --> 00:55:08,720 because it doesn't fit within our 1498 00:55:13,270 --> 00:55:11,200 paradigm not because it's extraordinary 1499 00:55:15,349 --> 00:55:13,280 but because of the implications of what 1500 00:55:18,069 --> 00:55:15,359 that would mean for you talk about a 1501 00:55:21,109 --> 00:55:18,079 measurement problem okay now we have to 1502 00:55:23,109 --> 00:55:21,119 measure the fact that you are somehow 1503 00:55:25,829 --> 00:55:23,119 aware of things that are happening 1504 00:55:27,990 --> 00:55:25,839 before they happen well you can see how 1505 00:55:29,750 --> 00:55:28,000 unsettling that is to science yeah 1506 00:55:31,990 --> 00:55:29,760 extraordinary it's extraordinary climb 1507 00:55:33,670 --> 00:55:32,000 requires extraordinary evidence 1508 00:55:36,069 --> 00:55:33,680 yes yes 1509 00:55:37,990 --> 00:55:36,079 now has anyone attempted to repeat that 1510 00:55:40,790 --> 00:55:38,000 has anyone attempted to repeat that 1511 00:55:42,470 --> 00:55:40,800 experiment and failed to repeat it 1512 00:55:44,630 --> 00:55:42,480 i don't know i'm sure they i'm sure they 1513 00:55:46,630 --> 00:55:44,640 have i he he deals 1514 00:55:49,109 --> 00:55:46,640 at great length with the file drawer 1515 00:55:51,030 --> 00:55:49,119 problem i mean this guy is a very 1516 00:55:52,470 --> 00:55:51,040 accomplished 1517 00:55:54,470 --> 00:55:52,480 scientist 1518 00:55:56,230 --> 00:55:54,480 yeah i don't doubt it but 1519 00:55:58,470 --> 00:55:56,240 you know if people have attempted to 1520 00:56:00,870 --> 00:55:58,480 replicate the experiment and have not 1521 00:56:03,349 --> 00:56:00,880 received received you know got got yes 1522 00:56:05,910 --> 00:56:03,359 yes yes the file the file drawer problem 1523 00:56:09,349 --> 00:56:05,920 but you're a philosopher i am a 1524 00:56:11,190 --> 00:56:09,359 entrepreneur and a podcaster we're not 1525 00:56:13,829 --> 00:56:11,200 we're not the ones to really say you 1526 00:56:16,950 --> 00:56:13,839 know to figure out those stats he has 1527 00:56:18,710 --> 00:56:16,960 he's published them in his book uh in 1528 00:56:20,470 --> 00:56:18,720 his many books and he's talked 1529 00:56:22,230 --> 00:56:20,480 specifically about estimating what the 1530 00:56:24,230 --> 00:56:22,240 file drawer problem might be and he's 1531 00:56:25,510 --> 00:56:24,240 calculated that into his calculations 1532 00:56:27,510 --> 00:56:25,520 yeah well because i know that for 1533 00:56:29,910 --> 00:56:27,520 example chris french has attempted to 1534 00:56:31,349 --> 00:56:29,920 well has repeated experiments has failed 1535 00:56:33,030 --> 00:56:31,359 to get the result that other people have 1536 00:56:34,230 --> 00:56:33,040 got and when he's tried to publish that 1537 00:56:37,109 --> 00:56:34,240 in the peer-reviewed journals they 1538 00:56:39,829 --> 00:56:37,119 refuse and they refuse because they're 1539 00:56:41,910 --> 00:56:39,839 only interested in in in publishing uh 1540 00:56:43,829 --> 00:56:41,920 positive results not negative rules okay 1541 00:56:45,349 --> 00:56:43,839 but not the null effect the null effect 1542 00:56:47,430 --> 00:56:45,359 isn't very uh 1543 00:56:50,069 --> 00:56:47,440 newsworthy or doesn't really make it 1544 00:56:53,270 --> 00:56:50,079 into uh many journals does it 1545 00:56:54,870 --> 00:56:53,280 i got the null effect yeah yeah so so 1546 00:56:57,349 --> 00:56:54,880 look you know it may be that this can be 1547 00:56:58,470 --> 00:56:57,359 established uh i'm older i'd be very you 1548 00:57:00,309 --> 00:56:58,480 know it's extraordinary i'd love to 1549 00:57:02,150 --> 00:57:00,319 believe it was true it's very exciting 1550 00:57:05,430 --> 00:57:02,160 uh but you know the evidence is gonna 1551 00:57:07,109 --> 00:57:05,440 have to be pretty damn extraordinary uh 1552 00:57:08,789 --> 00:57:07,119 maybe it is already i don't know i'm not 1553 00:57:11,109 --> 00:57:08,799 an expert in this area i look forward to 1554 00:57:13,589 --> 00:57:11,119 seeing more of it well well you are an 1555 00:57:15,190 --> 00:57:13,599 expert in any number of things 1556 00:57:16,789 --> 00:57:15,200 including i i don't want to say you know 1557 00:57:18,470 --> 00:57:16,799 what i was just about to say this would 1558 00:57:20,069 --> 00:57:18,480 be a terrible thing you're an expert in 1559 00:57:22,870 --> 00:57:20,079 [\h__\h] 1560 00:57:25,829 --> 00:57:22,880 but i mean that i mean that in a very 1561 00:57:29,190 --> 00:57:25,839 very nice way in a positive way because 1562 00:57:30,549 --> 00:57:29,200 you are the author again of this very 1563 00:57:33,190 --> 00:57:30,559 interesting book that a lot of people 1564 00:57:35,349 --> 00:57:33,200 will find useful for these kind of dorm 1565 00:57:37,510 --> 00:57:35,359 room debates that we get into whether we 1566 00:57:39,349 --> 00:57:37,520 still live in a dorm or not and that is 1567 00:57:42,150 --> 00:57:39,359 the book's title is believing [\h__\h] 1568 00:57:44,549 --> 00:57:42,160 how not to get sucked into an 1569 00:57:47,030 --> 00:57:44,559 intellectual black hole before we let 1570 00:57:49,030 --> 00:57:47,040 you go dr law tell us about some other 1571 00:57:51,990 --> 00:57:49,040 projects that you're working on what's 1572 00:57:53,430 --> 00:57:52,000 going on at the journal think and and 1573 00:57:54,950 --> 00:57:53,440 anything else that might be going on in 1574 00:57:56,150 --> 00:57:54,960 your world yeah well edit the journal 1575 00:57:57,910 --> 00:57:56,160 thing for the royal institute of 1576 00:57:59,829 --> 00:57:57,920 philosophy which is a journal name to 1577 00:58:01,270 --> 00:57:59,839 everyone so you know anyone and everyone 1578 00:58:02,470 --> 00:58:01,280 should be able to read it and understand 1579 00:58:04,069 --> 00:58:02,480 the stuff that's published in there we 1580 00:58:05,910 --> 00:58:04,079 try and make it accessible 1581 00:58:08,309 --> 00:58:05,920 uh and interesting to a general to the 1582 00:58:10,309 --> 00:58:08,319 general public um i've been i've been 1583 00:58:12,549 --> 00:58:10,319 working on some new children's books 1584 00:58:14,470 --> 00:58:12,559 ideas i published philosophy books for 1585 00:58:16,390 --> 00:58:14,480 children in the past probably the best 1586 00:58:17,829 --> 00:58:16,400 known one is the philosophy 1587 00:58:19,430 --> 00:58:17,839 files which i think was known as 1588 00:58:21,430 --> 00:58:19,440 philosophy rocks 1589 00:58:23,990 --> 00:58:21,440 in the united states of america 1590 00:58:25,910 --> 00:58:24,000 um in fact that's got a chapter on weird 1591 00:58:27,670 --> 00:58:25,920 and mysterious things in actually the 1592 00:58:29,670 --> 00:58:27,680 second volume of that occur the the 1593 00:58:30,549 --> 00:58:29,680 complete philosophy files 1594 00:58:32,950 --> 00:58:30,559 um 1595 00:58:34,789 --> 00:58:32,960 so i'm hoping to do a bit more work with 1596 00:58:36,549 --> 00:58:34,799 kids and critical thinking and just 1597 00:58:38,230 --> 00:58:36,559 getting them to think rigorously and 1598 00:58:40,309 --> 00:58:38,240 carefully about this stuff which i'm 1599 00:58:42,069 --> 00:58:40,319 sure you know you'd you you'd be very 1600 00:58:43,910 --> 00:58:42,079 much in favor of too you know you'd 1601 00:58:46,470 --> 00:58:43,920 agree with that absolutely don't think 1602 00:58:47,990 --> 00:58:46,480 of me as a debunker okay you think of 1603 00:58:49,430 --> 00:58:48,000 centre of inquiry as the debunking 1604 00:58:50,789 --> 00:58:49,440 organization no i'd like to think of 1605 00:58:51,990 --> 00:58:50,799 myself as just that 1606 00:58:53,910 --> 00:58:52,000 you know i there are many of these 1607 00:58:56,870 --> 00:58:53,920 claims that i would love to be true i 1608 00:58:59,510 --> 00:58:56,880 would love it to be true right that some 1609 00:59:02,470 --> 00:58:59,520 that there is some kind of precognition 1610 00:59:04,470 --> 00:59:02,480 ability that we have um because it would 1611 00:59:07,109 --> 00:59:04,480 be so exciting uh it would it would 1612 00:59:08,630 --> 00:59:07,119 completely undermine and challenge 1613 00:59:10,789 --> 00:59:08,640 so much of what we believe about how the 1614 00:59:13,990 --> 00:59:10,799 world works um it would open up new 1615 00:59:15,750 --> 00:59:14,000 vistas for us um so it's not that i'm 1616 00:59:17,829 --> 00:59:15,760 it's not that i'm in principle against 1617 00:59:19,510 --> 00:59:17,839 such beliefs it's just that before i 1618 00:59:20,950 --> 00:59:19,520 believe anything like that boy 1619 00:59:22,549 --> 00:59:20,960 somebody's gonna have to give me some 1620 00:59:24,230 --> 00:59:22,559 pretty great evidence and as you've 1621 00:59:26,230 --> 00:59:24,240 already agreed you know extraordinary 1622 00:59:27,990 --> 00:59:26,240 claims really do require pretty 1623 00:59:29,750 --> 00:59:28,000 extraordinary evidence so 1624 00:59:31,510 --> 00:59:29,760 let's get that evidence in maybe maybe 1625 00:59:34,630 --> 00:59:31,520 it's there already let's find out i'm 1626 00:59:37,349 --> 00:59:34,640 always leery of anyone who says i'd love 1627 00:59:39,589 --> 00:59:37,359 this to be true i've heard that so many 1628 00:59:42,069 --> 00:59:39,599 times i have to say in my heart of 1629 00:59:43,829 --> 00:59:42,079 hearts i don't know that i would love 1630 00:59:46,630 --> 00:59:43,839 for this to be true 1631 00:59:49,270 --> 00:59:46,640 any more than i'd love for anything else 1632 00:59:50,950 --> 00:59:49,280 that i believe in to be shown to me to 1633 00:59:54,069 --> 00:59:50,960 not be true i don't know that that's a 1634 00:59:55,910 --> 00:59:54,079 comfortable process what i know is that 1635 00:59:58,870 --> 00:59:55,920 i'm committed to 1636 01:00:01,910 --> 00:59:58,880 following the data wherever it takes me 1637 01:00:04,150 --> 01:00:01,920 and being fully open to 1638 01:00:05,430 --> 01:00:04,160 exploring the fact that i might be being 1639 01:00:07,589 --> 01:00:05,440 duped by 1640 01:00:09,829 --> 01:00:07,599 as you said in that quote that i really 1641 01:00:11,829 --> 01:00:09,839 liked either by someone else or by 1642 01:00:14,630 --> 01:00:11,839 myself into thinking something that 1643 01:00:19,270 --> 01:00:14,640 isn't true yeah you need to be very very 1644 01:00:21,589 --> 01:00:19,280 aware of that uh we need to make sure 1645 01:00:24,470 --> 01:00:21,599 that we're not led by wishful thinking 1646 01:00:26,309 --> 01:00:24,480 uh that we don't use mystery as a way of 1647 01:00:28,069 --> 01:00:26,319 immunizing our beliefs and protecting 1648 01:00:29,670 --> 01:00:28,079 what we believe against any kind of 1649 01:00:31,750 --> 01:00:29,680 intellectual threat 1650 01:00:33,510 --> 01:00:31,760 and so on it's simple for all sorts of 1651 01:00:35,349 --> 01:00:33,520 reasons not just when it comes to the 1652 01:00:36,870 --> 01:00:35,359 investigation of the paranormal so we're 1653 01:00:39,270 --> 01:00:36,880 all on board with that which is good i 1654 01:00:41,109 --> 01:00:39,280 think well dr law it's been great having 1655 01:00:42,950 --> 01:00:41,119 you on i certainly enjoyed such a 1656 01:00:44,870 --> 01:00:42,960 spirited discussion 1657 01:00:46,390 --> 01:00:44,880 and a lot of great stuff here thanks 1658 01:00:54,549 --> 01:00:46,400 again for joining me 1659 01:00:58,710 --> 01:00:56,309 thanks again to dr law for joining me 1660 01:01:01,510 --> 01:00:58,720 today on skeptico i have a couple of 1661 01:01:04,390 --> 01:01:01,520 questions i'd tee up from this interview 1662 01:01:05,430 --> 01:01:04,400 the first would be are you a biological 1663 01:01:07,109 --> 01:01:05,440 robot 1664 01:01:09,510 --> 01:01:07,119 something we talked about in this 1665 01:01:12,230 --> 01:01:09,520 interview of course this is the claim 1666 01:01:13,349 --> 01:01:12,240 made by richard dawkins that really is 1667 01:01:17,349 --> 01:01:13,359 at the 1668 01:01:20,510 --> 01:01:17,359 core the underbelly of the atheist claim 1669 01:01:23,910 --> 01:01:20,520 and that's that you are a machine an 1670 01:01:26,789 --> 01:01:23,920 electrochemical robot that is driven by 1671 01:01:30,470 --> 01:01:26,799 genetic instincts and environmental 1672 01:01:33,030 --> 01:01:30,480 programming and you are nothing more so 1673 01:01:35,270 --> 01:01:33,040 to me that seems absolutely absurd i 1674 01:01:37,910 --> 01:01:35,280 think the philosophical argument for 1675 01:01:40,390 --> 01:01:37,920 that is absurd but i'd love to hear 1676 01:01:41,589 --> 01:01:40,400 someone come forward and explain how 1677 01:01:44,230 --> 01:01:41,599 they are 1678 01:01:46,230 --> 01:01:44,240 a biological robot and that they accept 1679 01:01:48,390 --> 01:01:46,240 that and that's how they live their life 1680 01:01:50,630 --> 01:01:48,400 i'd love to hear from you i hope you 1681 01:01:53,670 --> 01:01:50,640 join us and answer that question 1682 01:01:55,750 --> 01:01:53,680 in the affirmative so we can talk to you 1683 01:01:58,069 --> 01:01:55,760 and the second question since we spent 1684 01:02:00,390 --> 01:01:58,079 so much time talking about it in this 1685 01:02:02,950 --> 01:02:00,400 interview is does it make any sense from 1686 01:02:05,670 --> 01:02:02,960 a from a philosophy of science 1687 01:02:08,230 --> 01:02:05,680 perspective to proclaim that 1688 01:02:10,950 --> 01:02:08,240 extraordinary claims require 1689 01:02:13,510 --> 01:02:10,960 extraordinary proof now you know my 1690 01:02:15,829 --> 01:02:13,520 opinion on this not only from this show 1691 01:02:17,829 --> 01:02:15,839 but from many previous shows but it was 1692 01:02:20,870 --> 01:02:17,839 interesting to joust a little bit with 1693 01:02:22,150 --> 01:02:20,880 dr law on this and hash it out once 1694 01:02:24,710 --> 01:02:22,160 again so i'd love to get your 1695 01:02:27,270 --> 01:02:24,720 perspective on that is there a way to 1696 01:02:30,230 --> 01:02:27,280 reasonably support that claim that 1697 01:02:32,710 --> 01:02:30,240 somehow extraordinary claims require 1698 01:02:35,270 --> 01:02:32,720 this level of extraordinary proof would 1699 01:02:37,430 --> 01:02:35,280 love to hear your opinion on that as 1700 01:02:39,510 --> 01:02:37,440 well as on the first question of course 1701 01:02:43,030 --> 01:02:39,520 the place to do that is at the skeptico 1702 01:02:45,750 --> 01:02:43,040 website at s-k-e-p-t-i-k 1703 01:02:47,670 --> 01:02:45,760 don't forget the k-o.com while you're 1704 01:02:49,910 --> 01:02:47,680 there you can drop us a comment right 1705 01:02:51,910 --> 01:02:49,920 there on the website click and bounce 1706 01:02:54,470 --> 01:02:51,920 over to the forum where there's usually 1707 01:02:56,710 --> 01:02:54,480 a lot going on or drop me an email or 1708 01:02:58,710 --> 01:02:56,720 connect with me on facebook while you're 1709 01:03:01,990 --> 01:02:58,720 at the skeptical website be sure to 1710 01:03:03,829 --> 01:03:02,000 check out over our 200 previous episodes 1711 01:03:05,750 --> 01:03:03,839 lots of good stuff in there it's all 1712 01:03:07,829 --> 01:03:05,760 free available for download from the 1713 01:03:10,470 --> 01:03:07,839 website and i always love to hear from 1714 01:03:12,710 --> 01:03:10,480 listeners who discover skeptico and then 1715 01:03:15,029 --> 01:03:12,720 are and then are inspired to dig into 1716 01:03:17,270 --> 01:03:15,039 some of those old episodes i have to say 1717 01:03:19,270 --> 01:03:17,280 i do the same thing when i find a 1718 01:03:21,670 --> 01:03:19,280 podcast that i'm really turned on to 1719 01:03:23,670 --> 01:03:21,680 that i didn't know before it's a great 1720 01:03:25,190 --> 01:03:23,680 surprise to find that there's so many 1721 01:03:27,990 --> 01:03:25,200 preview shows that i can go back and 1722 01:03:30,549 --> 01:03:28,000 listen to i really enjoy doing that and 1723 01:03:32,390 --> 01:03:30,559 of course i enjoy it when someone finds 1724 01:03:34,630 --> 01:03:32,400 skeptico and goes through the same 1725 01:03:36,309 --> 01:03:34,640 process so if that's you i'll welcome 1726 01:03:38,630 --> 01:03:36,319 you to do it i have a number of 1727 01:03:39,990 --> 01:03:38,640 interesting shows coming up on skeptico 1728 01:03:42,309 --> 01:03:40,000 they're coming along at a pretty good 1729 01:03:44,710 --> 01:03:42,319 pace and they're certainly not slowing 1730 01:03:47,029 --> 01:03:44,720 down i'll have to see how i do keeping 1731 01:03:49,750 --> 01:03:47,039 up but i'll do my best but that's going